Purpose: To assess whether the use of a non-crosslinked porcine collagen type I and III bi-layered membrane inter-positioned between the periosteum and a bone defect would interfere with the bone regenerative capacity of the periosteum.
Materials And Methods: Sixty rats, each with 1 critical-size calvarial defect (CSD; diameter, 5 mm) in the parietal bone, were randomly allocated to 1 of 3 equal-size groups after CSD creation: 1) the periosteum was excised and the flap was repositioned without interposition of a membrane (no-periosteum [NP] group); 2) the flap including the periosteum was repositioned (periosteum [P] group); and 3) a non-crosslinked collagen membrane was inter-positioned between the flap, including the periosteum, and the bone defect (membrane [M] group). Micro-computed tomography, qualitative histology, immunohistochemistry, and reverse transcription real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction were performed at 3, 7, 15, and 30 days postoperatively.
Results: A markedly increased radiographic residual defect length was observed in the NP group compared with the P group at 30 days. The NP group also presented a smaller radiographic bone fill area than the P group at 15 and 30 days and then the M group at 30 days. The P and M groups exhibited considerably greater expression of bone morphogenetic protein-2 and osteocalcin than the NP group at 7 days; expression of transforming growth factor-β1 was considerably greater in the NP group at 15 days. Further, the P group presented considerably higher gene expression levels of Runx2 and Jagged1 at 7 days and of alkaline phosphatase at 3 and 15 days compared with the M and NP groups.
Conclusion: Interposition of this specific non-crosslinked collagen membrane between the periosteum and the bone defect during guided bone regeneration interferes only slightly, if at all, with the bone regenerative capacity of the periosteum.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2018.07.004 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Photooxidation Cross-Linked, Glutaraldehyde Cross-Linked, or Enzyme and Hydrostatic Pressure Processed Decellularized Biomaterials for Cardiovascular Repair Do Not Affect Host Response in a Rat Right Ventricular Outflow Flow Tract Reconstruction (RVOT) Model.
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater
February 2025
McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) were responsible for approximately 19 million deaths in 2020, marking an increase of 18.7% since 2010. Biological decellularized patches are common therapeutic solutions for CVD such as cardiac and valve defects.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSMILE-Derived Corneal Stromal Lenticule: Experimental Study as a Corneal Repair Material and Drug Carrier.
Cornea
January 2025
Chongqing Eye and Vision Care Hospital Aier Eye Hospital Group, Yu Zhong, Chongqing, China.
Purpose: A detailed study of the physicochemical properties of SMILE-derived lenticules and evaluation of their drug delivery after loading with silver nanoparticles (AgNPs).
Methods: The lenticules were decellularized and modified with crosslinking concentrations of 0.01 (0.
The influence of different crosslinking agents onto the physical properties, integration behavior and immune response of collagen-based barrier membranes.
Front Bioeng Biotechnol
January 2025
Clinic and Policlinic for Dermatology and Venereology, University Medical Center Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
This study investigates the mechanical properties as well as and cyto- and biocompatibility of collagen membranes cross-linked with glutaraldehyde (GA), proanthocyanidins (PC), hexamethylendiisocyanate (HMDI) and 1-Ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide/N-hydroxysuccinimide (EC/NHS). A non-crosslinked membrane was used as reference control (RF). The initial cytotoxic analyses revealed that the PC, EC, and HMDI crosslinked membranes were cytocompatible, while the GA crosslinked membrane was cytotoxic and thus selected as positive control in the further study.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCrosslinked Versus Non-Crosslinked Resorbable Collagen Membranes for Periodontal Regeneration: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Non-Inferiority Clinical Trial.
J Periodontal Res
January 2025
Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Aim: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the results of combination therapy involving bone grafting and two different resorbable collagen membranes in 1-, 2- and 3-wall infrabony defects.
Methods: A total of 174 patients with infrabony defects (≥ 7 mm periodontal probing depth) were randomized to receive deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) with either a native porcine non-crosslinked collagen membrane (N-CM, control, n = 87) or a novel porcine crosslinked collagen membrane (C-CM, test, n = 87). Clinical parameters, including periodontal probing depth (PPD), clinical attachment level (CAL), and gingival recession (GR), were recorded at baseline, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks.
Medicated and multifunctional composite alginate-collagen-hyaluronate based scaffolds prepared using two different crosslinking approaches show potential for healing of chronic wounds.
Drug Deliv Transl Res
December 2024
School of Science, Faculty of Engineering and Science, University of Greenwich at Medway, Chatham Maritime, Kent, ME4 4TB, UK.
Chronic wounds present significant challenges with high morbidity and mortality. A cost-effective dressing that can absorb large exudate volumes, is hemostatic and therapeutically active is of current interest. This study compares two crosslinking approaches on composite scaffolds comprising fish collagen (FCOL), hyaluronic acid (HA) and sodium alginate (SA) by respectively targeting HA and SA.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!