Health-care providers have been challenged by changes in medical practice to include abortion, euthanasia, and controversial fertility technologies. These procedures go beyond saving lives, healing disease, and alleviating pain, the traditional purposes of medicine. The foundational principles of Western medical ethics, as characterized by the Hippocratic Oath, have been weakened or even rejected. The consequences of abandoning the Hippocratic tradition are illustrated by the eugenics movement, the Nazi Holocaust, the Tuskegee experiments, and contemporary bioethics theories. Physicians and other health-care personnel are under institutional and governmental pressure to succumb to anti-Hippocratic ethics. Conscience clauses are a means of defending medical practitioners from these trends. Characteristics of conscience legislation that protect health-care providers are described. Strong conscience clauses also protect the public by ensuring the survival of healthcare personnel with shared Hippocratic values.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6026968PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/002436312803571357DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

health-care providers
12
conscience clauses
8
conscience
4
conscience health-care
4
providers health-care
4
providers challenged
4
challenged changes
4
changes medical
4
medical practice
4
practice include
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!