AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to assess the effectiveness of CT versus MRCP in evaluating pancreatic duct injuries in children with high-grade pancreatic trauma.
  • Data from 21 pediatric patients showed that MRCP visualized the pancreatic duct more frequently and identified duct disruption more often than CT.
  • However, both imaging techniques did not significantly differ in confirming duct integrity, suggesting that additional methods like ERCP may be needed for accurate diagnosis.

Article Abstract

Purpose: Determining the integrity of the pancreatic duct is important in high-grade pancreatic trauma to guide decision making for operative vs non-operative management. Computed tomography (CT) is generally an inadequate study for this purpose, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is sometimes obtained to gain additional information regarding the duct. The purpose of this multi-institutional study was to directly compare the results from CT and MRCP for evaluating pancreatic duct disruption in children with these rare injuries.

Methods: Retrospective study of data obtained from eleven pediatric trauma centers from 2010 to 2015. Children up to age 18 with suspected blunt pancreatic duct injury who had both CT and MRCP within 1 week of injury were included. Imaging findings of both studies were directly compared and analyzed using descriptive statistics, Chi square, Wilcoxon rank-sum, and McNemar's tests.

Results: Data were collected for 21 patients (mean age 7.8 years). The duct was visualized more often on MRCP than CT (48 vs 5%, p < 0.05). Duct disruption was confirmed more often on MRCP than CT (24 vs 0%), suspected based on secondary findings equally (38 vs 38%), and more often indeterminate on CT (62 vs 38%). Overall, MRCP was not superior to CT for determining duct integrity (62 vs 38%, p = 0.28).

Conclusions: In children with blunt pancreatic injury, MRCP is more useful than CT for identifying the pancreatic duct but may not be superior for confirmation of duct integrity. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiogram (ERCP) may be necessary to confirm duct disruption when considering pancreatic resection.

Level Of Evidence: III.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00383-018-4309-2DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pancreatic duct
16
duct injury
8
pancreatic trauma
8
pancreatic
6
duct
6
comparison diagnostic
4
diagnostic imaging
4
imaging modalities
4
modalities evaluation
4
evaluation pancreatic
4

Similar Publications

Groove pancreatitis (GP) is a chronic segmental pancreatitis which leads to altered pancreatic secretions and pancreatitis. The exact pathogenesis of GP has not been clearly identified to date but heavy smoking and chronic alcohol consumption seem to be the main factors involved. The resulting chronic pancreatitis (CP) is a debilitating disease causing abdominal pain often refractory to medical therapy, so much that the main indication for surgical treatment is intractable abdominal pain.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

From Flare to Care: Pancreas Primer for Everyone.

Gastroenterol Clin North Am

March 2025

Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware Street SE, MMC 36, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. Electronic address:

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Updates in Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis.

Gastroenterol Clin North Am

March 2025

Division of Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA. Electronic address:

Although endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has been shown to be a safe and effective approach in treating these diseases while carrying lower morbidity than traditional surgical treatments, ERCP has associated risks, with post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) being the most common serious adverse event and carries significant morbidity and health care cost. PEP results from multifactorial factors involving trauma to the pancreatic duct and papilla, leading to subsequent obstruction and impairment of pancreatic drainage. Important risk factors for PEP include history of prior PEP, suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, difficult cannulation, pancreatic duct contrast injections, and pancreatic sphincterotomy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Pancreatic duct (PD) strictures, leaks, and disconnected ducts are important morphologic consequences of inflammatory disease of the pancreas, resulting in abdominal pain, pancreatic ascites, pancreatic pleural effusion, and external pancreatic fistula. Traditionally, these PD complications were treated surgically, but a better understanding of their pathophysiology, along with advancement in endoscopic interventions, has transformed the therapy from morbid surgical interventions to minimally invasive, safe, and effective endoscopic treatment. This review discusses the current diagnostic and management strategies for PD strictures, leaks, and disconnected pancreatic ducts.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Severe postoperative pancreatitis following treatment of peritoneal metastases.

Eur J Surg Oncol

January 2025

Program in Peritoneal Surface Malignancy, Washington Cancer Institute, Washington, DC, USA. Electronic address:

Postoperative pancreatitis is an unusual complication of upper abdominal surgery that can result in severe morbidity and has been associated with postoperative death. It can be caused by trauma to the surface of the gland, injury to pancreatic ducts, vascular compromise, ductal obstruction within the pancreas parenchyma or because of duodenal stagnation. Our database of peritoneal surface malignancy patients was surveyed in a search for patients who manifested signs and symptoms of severe postoperative pancreatitis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!