The optimal regimen of antiplatelet therapy for secondary prevention in noncardioembolic ischemic stroke remains controversial. We aimed to determine which regimen was associated with the greatest reduction in adverse outcomes. We analysed prospectively collected data from the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital Stroke Register. The sample population consisted of 3,572 participants (mean age 74.96 ± 12.67) with ischemic stroke, who were consecutively admitted between 2003 and 2015. Patients were placed on one of three antiplatelet regimens at hospital discharge; aspirin monotherapy, aspirin plus dipyridamole and clopidogrel. Clopidogrel and aspirin plus dipyridamole were compared to aspirin. A direct comparison between clopidogrel and aspirin plus dipyridamole was also performed. Outcomes included all-cause mortality and a combined end point of all-cause mortality and incidence of major adverse cardiac events (stroke or myocardial infarction). Cox-regression models adjusted for potential confounders at the following time periods after discharge; 0 to 90 days, 91 to 365 days, and 1 to 3 years. Aspirin plus dipyridamole was associated with a lower risk of mortality at 0 to 90 days; hazard ratio (HR) 0.62 (0.43 to 0.91). Clopidogrel was associated with a lower risk of mortality at 1 to 3 years; HR of 0.39 (0.26 to 0.60). Similar HRs were observed for the corresponding time points in the composite outcome. In conclusion, patients with noncardioembolic stroke may gain maximum benefits from aspirin plus dipyridamole initially (≤1 year) with a subsequent switch to clopidogrel, with regard to mortality and major adverse cardiac eventsoutcomes.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.05.043 | DOI Listing |
Eur Stroke J
November 2024
Department of Pharmacy, Guangxi Academy of Medical Sciences and the People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, Guangxi, People's Republic of China.
Introduction: The efficacy of different antiplatelet treatment in minor strokes (MSs) or transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) and that of antiplatelet and intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in MSs remain controversial.
Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library to identify all eligible articles until April 12, 2024. Efficacy outcomes were all-cause mortality, excellent outcome, functional independence and recurrent stroke.
Int J Surg
December 2024
Master Program in Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Kaohsiung Medical University.
Background: Free flap construction enhances the quality of life for head and neck cancer (HNC) patients; however, complications, such as thrombosis and hematoma, threaten flap survival. This study aimed to identify factors influencing flap failure, thrombosis, and hematoma.
Methods: A retrospective nested case-control study was conducted on HNC patients who underwent free flap reconstruction at a tertiary medical center between January 2019 and January 2022.
Pain Physician
August 2024
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Background: The role of antiplatelet/anticoagulant therapy is well known for its primary and secondary prevention of sequela from cardiovascular disease by decreasing the incidence of acute cerebral, cardiovascular, peripheral vascular, and other thrombo-embolicevents. The overwhelming data show that the risk of thrombotic events is significantly higher than that of bleeding during surgery after antiplatelet drug discontinuation. It has been assumed that discontinuing antiplatelet therapy prior to performing interventional pain management techniques is a common practice, even though doing so may potentially increase the risk of acute cerebral and cardiovascular events.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFExpert Opin Pharmacother
July 2024
Division of Cardiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Introduction: Ischemic etiology accounts for two thirds of all strokes in which platelet activation and aggregation play a major role. A variety of antiplatelet therapies have been tested for primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention, with certain patient subtypes benefiting more than others from a specific regimen.
Areas Covered: This review aims at synthetizing current evidence on pharmacology of antiplatelet agents approved for primary, secondary, and tertiary stroke prevention and their application among possible patient subtypes that may benefit more from their administration.
J Neurol Sci
August 2024
Vascular Neurology Research Foundation, c/o Department of Neurology, Tallaght University Hospital (TUH) / The Adelaide and Meath Hospital, Dublin, incorporating the National Children's Hospital (AMNCH), Dublin, Ireland; Department of Neurology, TUH / AMNCH, Dublin, Ireland; Stroke Service, TUH / AMNCH, Dublin, Ireland; Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, Royal Free Campus, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK; Academic Unit of Neurology, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland. Electronic address:
Data are limited on the impact of commencing antiplatelet therapy on von Willebrand Factor Antigen (VWF:Ag) or von Willebrand Factor propeptide (VWFpp) levels and ADAMTS13 activity, and their relationship with platelet reactivity following TIA/ischaemic stroke. In this pilot, observational study, VWF:Ag and VWFpp levels and ADAMTS13 activity were quantified in 48 patients ≤4 weeks of TIA/ischaemic stroke (baseline), and 14 days (14d) and 90 days (90d) after commencing aspirin, clopidogrel or aspirin+dipyridamole. Platelet reactivity was assessed at moderately-high shear stress (PFA-100® Collagen-Epinephrine / Collagen-ADP / INNOVANCE PFA P2Y assays), and low shear stress (VerifyNow® Aspirin / P2Y12, and Multiplate® Aspirin / ADP assays).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!