Background: The use of malnutrition screening tools (MSTs) among hospitalized pediatric patients is a simple practice that may allow the identification of patients at nutrition risk. There are different tools developed in the English language, but there are limited data available on their validity when translated into other languages. The aim of this study was to construct a Spanish version (SV) of the STRONGkids MST and determine its validity and reliability in a pediatric population.

Methods: The translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the tool was performed, followed by the reliability, feasibility, and validity of the SV of the STRONGkids MST. Anthropometric assessment was used as the reference standard to evaluate the criterion validity of the MST. The length of hospital stay was used to determine predictive validity.

Results: A total 400 children were included in the study, 90 of whom took part in the reliability phase. The interrater agreement between dietitians and nursing staff was kappa (κ) = 0.67, while the intrarater agreement among dietitians was κ = 0.82. The feasibility of the MST was adequate for clinical use. The results for criterion validity between STRONGkids and anthropometric assessment was κ = 0.56, and the criterion validity between STRONGkids and length of hospital stay was κ = 0.20. The sensitivity of the MST was 86% and the specificity was 72%.

Conclusions: The SV of the MST showed good reliability and feasibility. The validity is moderate, and the MST could be considered a useful resource for early detection of malnutrition risk.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ncp.10182DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

validity strongkids
12
criterion validity
12
spanish version
8
version strongkids
8
strongkids mst
8
reliability feasibility
8
feasibility validity
8
anthropometric assessment
8
length hospital
8
hospital stay
8

Similar Publications

Comparison of nutritional screening tools in pediatric oncology patients receiving chemotherapy treatment.

J Pediatr Nurs

November 2024

Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey. Electronic address:

Background: Malnutrition in pediatric oncology patients is a complex and multifactorial process, and the most appropriate screening tool to determine the risk of malnutrition is not clear. The study aimed to compare the Screening Tool for Risk on Nutritional Status and Growth (StrongKids), Pediatric Yorkhill Malnutrition Score (PYMS), Screening Tool for the Assessment of Malnutrition in Pediatrics (STAMP), which are commonly used in the general pediatric population, with the Nutrition Screening Tool for Childhood Cancer (SCAN), which was specifically validated for pediatric cancer, in determining the risk of malnutrition.

Methods: This cross-sectional study included 92 children aged 2-18 years who were admitted to the hematology-oncology unit and were receiving chemotherapy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Nutritional assessment plays a pivotal role in individual development and represents a fundamental component in the early identification of nutritional challenges and imbalances in pediatric patients. Among the validated instruments in the literature, the STRONGkids tool is the most utilized. This study aimed to undertake the translation and transcultural validation of the STRONGkids tool.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To evaluate predictive validity of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics/American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition Indicators to diagnose pediatric malnutrition (AAIMp) and the Screening Tool for Risk on Nutritional Status and Growth (STRONGkids) in regard to pediatric patient outcomes in US hospitals.

Study Design: A prospective cohort study (Clinical Trial Registry: NCT03928548) was completed from August 2019 through January 2023 with 27 pediatric hospitals or units from 18 US states and Washington DC.

Results: Three hundred and forty-five children were enrolled in the cohort (n = 188 in the AAIMp validation subgroup).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: This study constitutes a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort aiming to evaluate the potential correlation between nutritional risk and status at admission with the occurrence of post-discharge complications and hospital readmissions in children receiving care at high resource Centres.

Methods: Data was collected from 5 Canadian tertiary pediatric Centers between 2012 and 2016. Nutritional risk and status were evaluated at hospital admission with validated tools (STRONGkids and Subjective Global Nutrition Assessment [SGNA]) and anthropometric measurements.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The SCAN tool was developed to identify malnutrition risk in children with cancer but initially showed low effectiveness at diagnosing malnutrition during treatment.
  • The study involved measuring various health indicators in 49 children diagnosed with cancer to validate the SCAN tool for predicting nutritional needs, toxicities, and treatment outcomes.
  • While SCAN had improved effectiveness when applied periodically during treatment, the overall results indicated it couldn't reliably predict risk factors like relapse or survival rates.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!