Comparison between RME, SME and Leaf Expander in growing patients: a retrospective postero-anterior cephalometric study.

Eur J Paediatr Dent

MD, DDS, MS, Full Professor and Dean, Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Fondazione IRCCS Ca´ Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.

Published: September 2018

Aim: The aim of this study is to compare the dental and orthopaedic effects of the Leaf Expander with rapid and slow maxillary expanders.

Materials And Methods: The sample comprised 30 patients with a posterior crossbite divided into three groups: the rapid maxillary expander (RME) group (3 m, 7 f), average age 8.9 years; the slow maxillary expander (SME) group (7 m, 3 f) average age 12.2 years; the Leaf Expander (LE) group (7 m, 3 f), average age 7.9 years. Postero-anterior cephalometric studies have been obtained at the beginning of the therapy (T1) and after 9 months (T2). Nasal width, maxillary width, mandibular width, upper permanent molars width have been measured by a calibrated examiner.

Results: All the measurements increased significantly after the treatment (paired t-test P=0.05). Maxillary average width increased of 4.2 mm (SD 3.6 mm) in RME; + 2.8 mm (SD 2.8 mm) in RSE and +3.6 mm (SD 2.2 mm) in LE group. Upper permanent molars width increased: + 5.4 mm (SD 3.31 mm) in RME; + 5.4 mm (SD 3.3 mm) in SME and + 3.8 mm (SD 2.1 mm) in LE group. No statistical differencesbetween the groups have been found (t-student test P=.05).

Conclusions: The effectiveness of the LE in transversal deficiency correction has been confirmed.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.23804/ejpd.2018.19.03.6DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

leaf expander
12
group average
12
average age
12
rme sme
8
postero-anterior cephalometric
8
slow maxillary
8
maxillary expander
8
age years
8
sme group
8
upper permanent
8

Similar Publications

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the skeletal, dental, and soft tissue effects of the nickel titanium memory Leaf Expander in a growing sample of patients with unilateral posterior crossbite compared with a control group using digital models and lateral cephalometric radiographs.

Methods: The research included a total of 24 patients, 12 of whom were treated and 12 untreated. The Leaf Expander group consisted of 4 males and 8 females (mean age= 8.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aim: To evaluate palatal surface effects induced by LE and RPE, alongside spontaneous changes in an untreated group, and to compare differences in canine and molar inclination among the three groups.

Materials: This randomised clinical trial aimed to compare digital models pre- and post-treatment over 12 months in patients receiving tooth-borne Leaf Expander® (LE) and tooth-borne Hyrax-type maxillary expander (RPE) treatments, alongside untreated patients. Analysis included 24 LE patients (13 males, 11 females, mean age 8.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: The aim of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to evaluate the spontaneous distorotation of upper first permanent molars and the transverse dentoalveolar changes on digital casts in growing patients following maxillary expansion treatment using either the Leaf Expander® or the rapid maxillary expander (RME), both anchored to the deciduous second molar.

Trial Design And Setting: This study was a two-arm, parallel-assignment, RCT with a dual-centre design conducted at two teaching hospitals in Italy.

Participants: Inclusion criteria included maxillary transverse deficiency, prepubertal development stage (cervical vertebra maturation stage [CVMS] 1-2) and early mixed dentition with fully erupted upper first permanent molars.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • - The study aimed to assess the impact of two types of expanders (hyrax expander and leaf expander) on the shape of the palatal vault in patients with maxillary transverse deficiency using 3D analysis.
  • - A total of 250 patients were included, with 127 treated with the hyrax expander and 123 with the leaf expander, analyzing changes in palatal shape before and after treatment over 12 months.
  • - Results indicated that the hyrax expander significantly lowered the palatal vault, while the leaf expander showed no significant change, highlighting the distinct effects of each device on palatal morphology.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: This systematic review aims to analyze the spontaneous dentoalveolar changes in the mandibular arch after maxillary expansion in growing patients obtained with different expansion protocols: Rapid Maxillary Expansion (RME), Slow Maxillary Expansion (SME), and Leaf Expander.

Methods: The study adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Eligibility criteria were established in the PICO format, involving patients who underwent slow, rapid, or leaf maxillary expansion during the mixed or early permanent dentitions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!