A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Comparison of ethanol tolerance between potential cyanobacterial production hosts. | LitMetric

Comparison of ethanol tolerance between potential cyanobacterial production hosts.

J Biotechnol

Molecular Plant Biology, Department of Biochemistry, University of Turku, 20014 Turku, Finland. Electronic address:

Published: October 2018

Cyanobacteria are photosynthetic prokaryotes that have been extensively studied as potential autotrophic biotechnological hosts for the production of different carbon-based end-products directly from atmospheric CO. While commercially competitive applications do not yet exist, the production of ethanol in cyanobacteria is the most mature technology, endorsed by relatively high production yields and established status of ethanol in the global biofuel market. Within this concept, the aim here was to systematically compare ethanol tolerance of different commonly used cyanobacterial strains and substrains, in order to assess their relative potential for biotechnological production platforms. The comparison revealed clear strain-specific differences in ethanol toxicity, with growth inhibition GI values ranging between 3 g L (0.4% V/V) and 28 g L (3.5% V/V). The most tolerant wild-type strains were Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 (substrain A) and Synechococcus sp. PCC 7002, which did not show any apparent effect in growth below ethanol concentrations 9.2 g L (1.2% V/V). In comparison to typical biotechnological yeast strains used for ethanol fermentation, these values are clearly lower but still around the same order of magnitude. The results also underlined the challenges in direct number-based comparison between cyanobacterial strains and culture conditions due to inconsistencies in respect to chlorophyll content, cell morphology and optical properties.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2018.07.034DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ethanol tolerance
8
cyanobacterial strains
8
ethanol
6
production
5
comparison
4
comparison ethanol
4
tolerance potential
4
potential cyanobacterial
4
cyanobacterial production
4
production hosts
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!