This study assessed the applicability to medical professionals in Ethiopia of an abortion stigma assessment tool developed for community members, and examined the relationship between stigma and willingness to provide safe abortion care (SAC). The Stigmatizing Attitudes, Beliefs and Actions Scale (SABAS) was fielded to a convenience sample of 397 Ethiopian midwives. Scale reliability and validity were assessed, and associations were examined using multivariate linear and logistic regression. Levels of stigma were low compared to those reported elsewhere, and 49% of midwives were willing to provide SAC. The revised SABAS was reliable (alpha = 0.82), but items did not group into SABAS' conceptual categories, and some had limited face validity. SABAS scores had a small but significant negative association with willingness to provide SAC (OR=0.95, p < 0.05), with negative stereotyping subscale items most predictive. SABAS' limitations found here suggest the need for an adapted scale for medical professionals.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.29063/ajrh2018/v22i2.3DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

abortion stigma
8
stigmatizing attitudes
8
attitudes beliefs
8
beliefs actions
8
actions scale
8
scale sabas
8
ethiopian midwives
8
medical professionals
8
willingness provide
8
provide sac
8

Similar Publications

Comprehensive sexuality education (CSE) is curriculum-based teaching and learning of various dimensions of sexuality. By equipping young people with accurate information on sexual and reproductive health, CSE promotes healthier populations and fosters a more informed workforce, contributing positively to national economies. Although known to have many benefits, CSE is not universally accepted or implemented.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Abortion is taboo in Pakistani society, and it is stigmatised throughout the country, regardless of legal permission. Despite the burdens imposed by social norms of pronatalism and motherhood, women do exercise agency to have abortions. This study explores the experiences of women who have had induced abortions and maintained their social status within the community.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Social stigma and the marginalisation of abortion care within medical settings can negatively affect abortion providers. While some research has evaluated stigma interventions in legally restrictive settings, little work has explored the experiences of healthcare professionals (HCPs) providing abortion and post-abortion care (PAC) outside the USA. This study, part of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists' 'Making Abortion Safe' programme, aimed to understand providers' experiences of abortion stigma in four African countries with restrictive legislation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Following the US Supreme Court decision overturning Roe v. Wade, there is evidence of limitations in access to safe abortion care. Artificially intelligent (AI)-enabled conversational chatbots are becoming an appealing option to support access to care, but generative AI systems can misinform and hallucinate and risk reinforcing problematic bias and stigma related to sexual and reproductive healthcare.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background General practice has a key role in reducing inequity in access to sexual and reproductive health (SRH). Unplanned pregnancy, abortion and STIs are increasing and disproportionately affects deprived communities and ethnic minority groups. The candidacy framework offers a practical, theoretical framework for understanding the complex interactional processes of access to SRH in general practice.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!