Ethics Review of Projects (ERoP): A Conceptual Framework.

Healthc Q

Works for Alberta Health Services (AHS), Department of Health Systems Evaluation & Evidence, in the role of lead, Project Ethics. She has been involved with ARECCI as a reviewer and facilitator for over 8 years. Prior to 2015, she worked with the AHS Cross Cancer Institute Clinical Trials group and Radiation Oncology department, coordinating multi-centre randomized controlled trials and investigator-initiated trials for over 25 years. She can be contacted at 7220, 11402 University Avenue, Edmonton, AB T6G 2J3; tel: 780-407-4669; fax.: 780-407-8979.

Published: April 2018

Ethical risks are routinely assessed and mitigated in research studies. The same risks can exist in program evaluations and quality improvement initiatives and yet may not be routinely and comprehensively addressed. The authors present a conceptual framework that can help organizations develop comprehensive ethics review processes for non-research knowledge-generating projects (NRKGPs). They provide strategies that can be implemented in three progressive domains and illustrate the framework's application using two examples of health organizations with existing NRKGP ethics review processes. They conclude the article by discussing some lessons learned.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.12927/hcq.2018.25527DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ethics review
12
conceptual framework
8
review processes
8
review projects
4
projects erop
4
erop conceptual
4
framework ethical
4
ethical risks
4
risks routinely
4
routinely assessed
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!