Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background/purpose: Preoperative evaluation of the contralateral anatomic lateral distal femoral angle (aLDFA) at our institution is used to judge coronal plane alignment. In our study, we investigated 4 different techniques for obtaining an anteroposterior intraoperative fluoroscopic image of the distal femur to determine which technique provides (1) the greatest interobserver reliability; (2) the lowest variability from the previously published population mean; and (3) the lowest side-to-side variability.
Methods: Inclusion criteria included lower extremity injuries needing fixation that required intraoperative fluoroscopy with an intact femur and an intact extensor mechanism (N = 100). Fluoroscopic images were obtained of the distal femur in 4 positions differentiated by the position of the limb and the orientation of the C-arm beam to the femoral shaft.
Results: All measurement techniques resulted in mean measurements within one degree of 81 degrees. Variance between measurements was small among patients with all views, but images that involved a true anteroposterior with the beam perpendicular to the femur had the lowest rate of measurements that were <78 or >84 degrees.
Conclusion: Side-to-side differences in patients were <2 degrees on average with every image used. With the best-performing images, 20% of patients had an aLDFA > 3 degrees different from the population mean of 81 degrees and 3% of patients were >5 degrees different. Although restoring aLDFA to 81 degrees will be within 3 degrees of the contralateral side the vast majority of the time, matching the aLDFA to the injured side will be the most accurate reconstruction.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000001221 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!