A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Labile and recalcitrant sediment organic carbon pools in the Pearl River Estuary, southern China. | LitMetric

Labile and recalcitrant sediment organic carbon pools in the Pearl River Estuary, southern China.

Sci Total Environ

Key Laboratory of Tropical Marine Bio-resources and Ecology, South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510301, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.

Published: November 2018

Little is known about the labile and recalcitrant sediment organic carbon (SOC) in estuarine ecosystem, and the effects of human activities on SOC sequestration also remain poorly understood. In this study, sediment cores in the Pearl River Estuary (PRE) and adjacent coastal areas in the South China Sea were collected to analyse variations in the sources of SOC and its labile and recalcitrant pools. Concentrations of SOC, microbial biomass carbon (MBC), and recalcitrant organic carbon (ROC) ranged from 4.37 to 10.4 g/kg, 0.522 to 1.53 g/kg, and 1.59 to 5.42 g/kg, respectively, with their corresponding mean values as 7.20 ± 1.43 g/kg, 0.896 ± 0.228 g/kg, and 3.71 ± 1.01 g/kg, respectively. ROC was the chief fraction of SOC, and SOC, MBC and ROC has a similar source. Higher SOC and MBC were observed in the upper sediments, which might be attributable to the enhancement of seawater nutrient and particulate organic carbon concentrations in recent decades. Higher concentrations of SOC, ROC, and SOC stock were found in the inner estuary relative to the outer estuary due to a higher terrigenous organic carbon contribution, while the ratio of water-soluble organic carbon, salt-extractable carbon, and MBC to SOC exhibited a contrasting trend caused by a higher autochthonous contribution. Sand excavation reduced SOC, ROC, ROC/SOC, and SOC stock. The estimated SOC stock of the top 75 cm of sediment in the PRE was 34.0 Mg C ha, and the reduction of SOC stock in the PRE due to sea reclamation from 1973 to 2015 was 1,171,159.6 Mg C. Therefore, measures should be taken to control sea reclamation and sand excavation activities in the PRE to enhance carbon sequestration capacity.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.389DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

organic carbon
24
soc stock
16
soc
14
labile recalcitrant
12
carbon
9
recalcitrant sediment
8
sediment organic
8
pearl river
8
river estuary
8
concentrations soc
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!