Antibacterial effect of ceftolozane/tazobactam in combination with amikacin against aerobic Gram-negative bacilli studied in an in vitro pharmacokinetic model of infection.

Objectives: To use a pre-clinical infection model to assess the antibacterial effect of human simulations of dosing with ceftolozane/tazobactam (with or without amikacin) or meropenem against Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Methods: An in vitro pharmacokinetic model was used to assess changes in bacterial load and profiles after exposure to mean human serum concentrations over 168 h. Changes in area under the bacterial kill curve (AUBKC; log cfu/mL·h) and growth on 4 × MIC recovery plates were the co-primary outcome measures.

Results: Simulations of ceftolozane/tazobactam at 1 g/0.5 g or 2 g/1 g q8h or meropenem 2 g q8h all produced a >4 log reduction in bacterial load of Escherichia coli. Meropenem had smaller AUBKC values, indicating greater reduction in bacterial load than ceftolozane/tazobactam. Meropenem was also more effective than ceftolozane/tazobactam against Klebsiella pneumoniae strains. All regimens were equally effective in reducing P. aeruginosa bacterial load measured by AUBKC but growth on 4 × MIC recovery plates and changes in population profiles were only seen with meropenem. Addition of amikacin at 15 mg/kg q24h or 7.5 mg/kg q12h to 2 g/1 g of ceftolozane/tazobactam produced greater reductions in bacterial load but generated changes in amikacin population profiles with the 7.5 mg/kg q12h amikacin simulation.

Conclusions: The doses of ceftolozane/tazobactam simulated were highly effective in reducing the bacterial load of E. coli (MIC ≤0.25 mg/L), but less so for K. pneumoniae (MIC 4 mg/L). For both species, meropenem produced an overall greater reduction in pathogen load. Ceftolozane/tazobactam and meropenem were equally effective as monotherapy against P. aeruginosa but emergence of resistance occurred with meropenem. Addition of amikacin to ceftolozane/tazobactam reduced the bacterial load of P. aeruginosa at the expense of emergence of resistance to amikacin.