Background: While early weightbearing protocols have been advocated after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, early weightbearing after fibular (lateral) collateral ligament reconstruction has not been well defined.
Purpose: (1) To determine if early partial controlled weightbearing after fibular collateral ligament (FCL) reconstruction resulted in an objective difference in laxity on varus stress radiographs at postoperative 6 months as compared with nonweightbearing, and (2) to determine if there was a difference in pain, edema, range of motion, and subjective patient-reported outcomes between these groups at 3 time points.
Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.
Methods: Patients were prospectively enrolled from January 2014 to April 2017. Patients who underwent isolated FCL reconstruction or combined ACL and FCL reconstructions were included in this study. Patients were randomly assigned to either a control group (nonweightbearing for 6 weeks) or a treatment group (partial controlled weightbearing at 40% body weight with crutches for 6 weeks). Patient-related data, including knee pain, edema, and range of motion, were collected for all patients at postoperative day 1, 6 weeks, and 6 months. Subjective outcomes were collected preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively. The primary objective endpoint was varus stability, evaluated by bilateral varus stress radiographs obtained preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively.
Results: Thirty-nine patients were enrolled in the study, with 6-month follow-up obtained for 36 (92%). There was a significant improvement between the preoperative side-to-side difference (SSD) (2.4 ± 1.0) and postoperative SSD (0.2 ± 1.0) for lateral compartment laxity on varus stress radiographs among all patients ( P < .001). Clinical and statistical equivalence was found between groups in terms of SSD on varus stress radiographs ( P < .001). The SSD in knee edema was significantly lower in the partial early weightbearing group (beta = -0.6 cm, P = .001), but there were no significant group differences in knee pain, flexion, or extension. All patients demonstrated significant improvements in subjective outcome scores between the preoperative and 6-month postoperative conditions ( P < .001 for every score measured).
Conclusion: Clinical and statistical equivalence was found at postoperative 6 months between the early partial weightbearing and nonweightbearing groups among patients undergoing either an isolated FCL reconstruction or a combined ACL and FCL reconstruction. There were no significant differences observed between the groups regarding knee stability, pain, swelling, range of motion, or subjective outcomes. Given these findings, the authors recommend early partial weightbearing after isolated FCL reconstruction or combined ACL and FCL reconstruction.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0363546518784301 | DOI Listing |
Introduction: Fibular- and tibiofibular-based reconstructions are the gold standard treatment for posterolateral corner (PLC) injuries of the knee. This is the first report describing a wholly tibial-based PLC reconstruction.
Case Report: A 50-year-old female presented with knee instability following proximal fibular resection for a benign tumor, associated with chronic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficiency from a previous injury.
Arthrosc Tech
October 2024
Twin Cities Orthopedics, Edina, Minnesota, U.S.A.
Fibular collateral ligament (FCL) tears rarely occur in isolation and are typically injured in conjunction with another ligament, including the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). Reconstruction of both ACL and the FCL is critical to restore proper knee biomechanics and stability. This technique describes an anatomic reconstruction of both the ACL using a bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft and the FCL using a semitendinosus hamstring autograft.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFKnee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc
December 2023
Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, 1611 W Harrison St., Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Purpose: There remains controversy regarding the optimal surgical treatment for acute complete (grade III) posterolateral corner (PLC) injuries. The purpose of this article is to systematically review the contemporary literature regarding surgical options and subsequent outcomes of acute grade III PLC injuries.
Methods: A systematic review was performed using the following search terms: posterolateral corner knee, posterolateral knee, posterolateral instability, multi-ligament knee, and knee dislocation.
Int Orthop
March 2024
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Pontifical Catholic University of Chile, 362 Diagonal Paraguay, 8330077, Santiago, Chile.
Purpose: The most popular knee posterolateral corner (PLC) reconstruction techniques describe that a common peroneal nerve (CPN) neurolysis must be done to safely address the posterolateral aspect of the knee. The purpose of this study was to measure the distance between the CPN and the fibular insertion of the FCL in different degrees of knee flexion in cadaveric specimens, to identify if tunnel drilling could be done anatomically and safely without a CPN neurolysis.
Methods: Ex vivo experimental analytical study.
Cureus
August 2023
Orthopaedic Surgery, Wright State University, Dayton, USA.
Introduction: Injury to the posterolateral corner (PLC) of the knee often requires surgical reconstruction. There remains no consensus on treatment for PLC injury, and, therefore, it is imperative to have a reproducible injury model to improve the general knowledge of PLC injuries. A novel cadaveric model of isolated PLC injury is proposed and evaluated using radiographic parameters as well as gross dissection.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!