A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Simulation as an educational tool in acute nursing care: A controlled intervention study. | LitMetric

Simulation as an educational tool in acute nursing care: A controlled intervention study.

Nurse Educ Pract

Research Unit of Health Science, Hospital of Southwest Jutland, Esbjerg & Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark. Electronic address:

Published: September 2018

Simulations have become a common educational tool among nursing students; however, the impact of clinical simulations as tested using an experimental design is not yet well established. In a controlled intervention study, nursing students received either traditional classroom lessons (C) or traditional classroom lessons combined with simulation-based lessons at the hospital (I). The primary outcome variable was the basic knowledge of acute nursing measured by a multiple-choice questionnaire. Secondary outcome variables were grade point average, the students' perception of the learning process, and self-efficacy. Seventy-four students participated in the study; C:n = 36 and I:n = 38. Regarding basic knowledge, there was no significant difference between the groups (I:11.8 ± 0.4, C:12.1 ± 0.4, p = 0.54). The I-group had a more positive perception of the learning process (Δ:6.0 ± 1.1,p < 0.002) and rated their self-efficacy higher (Δ:8.5 ± 2.3,p < 0.002). The students reported higher levels of self-efficacy, when combining the traditional lessons and simulation-based lessons. When combining the two approaches, their fundamental knowledge is not improved.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2018.07.001DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

educational tool
8
acute nursing
8
controlled intervention
8
intervention study
8
nursing students
8
traditional classroom
8
classroom lessons
8
basic knowledge
8
perception learning
8
learning process
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!