Background: Biologic age may better reflect an individual's rate of aging than chronologic age.

Methods: We conducted a transcriptome-wide association study with biologic age estimated with clinical biomarkers, which included: systolic blood pressure, forced expiratory volume at 1 second (FEV1), total cholesterol, fasting glucose, C-reactive protein, and serum creatinine. We assessed the association between the difference between biologic age and chronologic age (∆age) and gene expression in whole blood measured using the Affymetrix Human Exon 1.0st Array.

Results: Our discovery sample included 2,163 participants from the Framingham Offspring cohort (mean age 67 ± 9 years, 55% women). A total of 481 genes were significantly associated with ∆age (p < 2.8 × 10-6). Among them, 415 genes were validated (p < .05/481 = 1.0 × 10-4) in 2,946 participants from the Framingham Third Generation cohort (mean age 46 ± 9 years, 53% women). Many of the significant genes were involved in the ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis pathway. The replication in 414 Rotterdam Study participants (mean age 59 ± 8, 52% women) found 104 of 415 validated genes reached nominal significance (p < .05).

Conclusion: We identified and validated 415 genes associated with ∆age in a community-based cohort. Future functional characterization of the biologic age-related gene network may identify targets to test for interventions to delay aging in older adults.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6298179PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gerona/gly164DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

biologic age
12
gene expression
8
age
8
participants framingham
8
cohort age
8
age years
8
genes associated
8
associated ∆age
8
415 genes
8
genes
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!