Chromoendoscopy Plus Mucosal Resection Versus Conventional Electrocoagulation for Intestinal Polyps in Children: Two Case Series.

Background: Conventional high-frequency electrocoagulation (HFEC) of intestinal polyps may be difficult in children and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) could be a less invasive option. Chromoendoscopy improves tissue localization during endoscopy, but its exact influence on the outcomes of children with intestinal lesions is still unknown.

Aims: To analyze a series of children treated with EMR or HFEC and assess the value of chromoendoscopy.

Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of two case series of patients treated at the Gastroenterology Department of the Guiyang Children's Hospital between February 2014 and November 2016. The children underwent EMR (n = 34) or conventional HFEC (n = 120). Demographic, clinical, and perioperative data were analyzed.

Results: The polyps were larger in the HFEC group [median, 3.9 (0.1-27.0) versus 1.3 (0.03-64.0) mm, P = .03]. There was a higher frequency of multiple polyps in the EMR group (50.0% versus 15.1%, P < .001). Operation time and intraoperative bleeding were similar between the two groups (both P > .05). Hospital stay was longer with EMR than with HFEC [median, 5 (3-12) versus 4 (2-14) days, P = .02]. There was no intestinal perforation in either group. Postoperative bleeding amount was similar in both groups (P = .73). In the EMR group, 19 patients were operated using chromoendoscopy, whereas only 2 patients in the HFEC group were operated.

Conclusion: EMR could be appropriate for the treatment of intestinal polyps in children.