Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
One-hundred maize samples were analyzed for fungal contamination using conventional and molecular methods. The percentage incidence of different genera isolated revealed the predominance of (82%), (63%), and species (33%) compared to other genera. occurred in 90% and 74% of small scale and commercial samples, respectively, while occurred in small scale and commercial samples at an incidence rate of 64% and 62%, respectively. However, among the species, have the highest incidence of 70% and 76% in commercial and small-scale maize, respectively, while has 56% total incidence. (27%) were also the most dominant of these genera. Fungal genera isolated included Alternaria and Cladosporium although occurring at a lower incidence level of 30%, 32% and 16%, 20%, respectively, in small-scale and commercial samples. The results emphasize that farmers and consumers should be alerted to the danger of fungal contamination in maize.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6021706 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.561 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!