AI Article Synopsis

  • The study analyzes disparities in nursing home quality across different socioeconomic counties, particularly focusing on those with lower star ratings within the NHC system.
  • It finds that nursing homes in counties with lower socioeconomic status (SES) generally have lower star ratings in overall quality, nurse staffing, and other measures.
  • The findings indicate a significant regional clustering of lower-rated nursing homes, particularly in the Southern U.S., highlighting the need for policies addressing these gaps in care access.

Article Abstract

Objectives: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Nursing Home Compare (NHC) serves as the most comprehensive repository of Medicaid- and/or Medicare-certified nursing homes providing services to approximately 1.4 million US residents. A gap in the literature exists in understanding on the national level whether residents from socioeconomically disadvantaged counties experience disparities in the access to nursing homes with higher NHC star ratings. The study aimed to examine nursing home quality variations with regard to county-level socioeconomic, geographic, and metropolitan status, while adjusting for nursing home facility-level characteristics.

Design: Cross-sectional ecological study.

Setting And Participants: 15,090 Medicaid/Medicare-certified nursing homes with nonmissing star ratings.

Measures: Study outcomes were NHC overall, health inspection survey, nurse staffing, and quality measure star ratings. County-level measures included SES index, geographic regions, and metropolitan status. Facility-level characteristics included ownership, chain affiliation, type and length of Medicaid/Medicare certification, hospital affiliation, continuing care retirement community status, number of certified beds, and occupancy.

Results: Counties with average adjusted overall, nurse staffing, and quality measure star ratings below 3 stars appeared to be clustered in the South. Nursing homes located in counties with lower SES were associated with lower overall star ratings [adjusted mean stars: 3.66 to 3.84, 95% confidence interval (CI): (3.54, 3.79) to (3.73, 3.95)]. A similar pattern was observed in staffing [adjusted mean stars: 3.75 to 4.23, 95% CI: (3.54, 3.97) to (4.10, 4.35)] and quality ratings [adjusted mean stars: 3.29 to 3.52, 95% CI: (3.12, 3.47) to (3.35, 3.69)].

Conclusions: Residents in socioeconomically disadvantaged counties experience disparities in accessing nursing homes with higher star ratings. These areas may lack sufficient resources to adequately staff the facility and deliver care that meets industry quality standards. These issues are likely to persist and possibly even worsen for the lower- and middle-class geriatric population given the current uncertainty around healthcare reform.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2018.05.017DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

nursing homes
24
star ratings
24
[adjusted stars
12
nursing
9
socioeconomic geographic
8
disparities accessing
8
accessing nursing
8
residents socioeconomically
8
socioeconomically disadvantaged
8
disadvantaged counties
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!