Doctors Francis Timothy Hartnett, Zygmunt Epstein and Izso Hartmayer Van der Hope were the first medical practitioners to appeal against decisions of the Medical Board of Victoria (Board) to cancel doctors' registration to practise medicine after finding that they had engaged in infamous conduct in a professional respect. This article analyses the Board's decisions in the 1940s regarding these three doctors and their appeals. The article argues that the doctors were unconventional and the Board's members, whose own career successes were built on their adherence to custom, allowed their aversion to the doctors' nonconformity to compromise their impartial assessment of their behaviour. The Board had only the finding of infamous conduct and the sanction of deregistration with which to respond to doctors; conduct that fell below professional standards, but in these three cases, cancellation of the doctors' registration to practise medicine was unduly severe and disproportionate to the gravity of their behaviour. This investigation illustrates the importance of the passage of legislation - after these cases were heard - empowering the Board to impose more lenient sanctions than deregistration for doctors' unprofessional conduct. It also highlights that regulators of the medical profession must still ensure that any antipathy they may feel towards doctors for their unconventionality does not influence their assessment of a fitting response to their conduct.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv
October 2024
Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Magn Reson Med
July 2023
Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg
August 2022
Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Objectives: A minimally invasive lobectomy (MIL) is the standard treatment for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in medically operable patients. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is recommended for inoperable patients and has been proposed as a potential alternative for operable patients as well. Here, we present the results of a feasibility study in preparation for a nationwide retrospective cohort study, comparing outcomes between both treatment modalities.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFClin Exp Allergy
August 2021
Department of Dermatology/Allergology, University Medical Center Utrecht, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Br J Anaesth
June 2021
Department of Anaesthesiology, Pharmacology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland; University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Background: Neonates and infants requiring anaesthesia are at risk of physiological instability and complications, but triggers for peri-anaesthetic interventions and associations with subsequent outcome are unknown.
Methods: This prospective, observational study recruited patients up to 60 weeks' postmenstrual age undergoing anaesthesia for surgical or diagnostic procedures from 165 centres in 31 European countries between March 2016 and January 2017. The primary aim was to identify thresholds of pre-determined physiological variables that triggered a medical intervention.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!