It feels intuitive that our actions are intentional, but there is considerable debate about whether (and how) humans control their motor behavior. Recent ideomotor theories of action argue that action intentions are fundamentally perceptual, that actions are not only controlled by anticipating-imagining-their intended perceptual consequences, but are also initiated when this action effect activation is strong. Here, the authors report a study (plus a replication) that provides direct evidence for this proposal, showing that even nonintended actions are executed when their effects are activated strongly enough. Participants mentally rehearsed a movement sequence and were unexpectedly presented with salient visual cues that were either compatible or incompatible with their currently imagined action. As predicted by ideomotor theories, the combined activation through imagery and perception was sufficient to trigger involuntary actions, even when participants were forewarned and asked to withhold them. Ideomotor cues, therefore, do not only influence preplanned responses but can effectively insert intentions to act, creating behavior de novo, as predicted from ideomotor theories of action control. (PsycINFO Database Record

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xge0000435DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ideomotor theories
12
perceptual consequences
8
motor behavior
8
theories action
8
predicted ideomotor
8
action
5
intention insertion
4
insertion activating
4
activating action's
4
action's perceptual
4

Similar Publications

Directed connectivity in theta networks supports action-effect integration.

Neuroimage

January 2025

Cognitive Neurophysiology, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, Germany; School of Psychology, Shandong Normal University, Jinan, China. Electronic address:

The ability to plan and carry out goal-directed behavior presupposes knowledge about the contingencies between movements and their effects. Ideomotor accounts of action control assume that agents integrate action-effect contingencies by creating action-effect bindings, which associate movement patterns with their sensory consequences. However, the neurophysiological underpinnings of action-effect binding are not yet well understood.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

How a co-actor's (Un-) reliability modulates goal selection in a novel joint goal-setting paradigm.

Psychol Res

November 2024

Institute of Psychology, University of Regensburg, Universitätsstr. 31, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.

Sociomotor theory - an extension of ideomotor theory - suggests that actions can also be represented in terms of the effects they elicit from others. But what if those others violate one's action effect anticipations? Here, we introduce a novel joint goal-setting paradigm to investigate effects of co-actors' occasional and overall unreliability on an individual's goal selection. In a first step, the participant moved a target halfway from the bottom center to the top left or right corner of the computer screen.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Brain Function, Learning, and Role of Feedback in Complete Paralysis.

Sensors (Basel)

September 2024

Institute of Medical Psychology and Behavioral Neurobiology, Tübingen University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.

Article Synopsis
  • * The research suggests that despite paralysis, preserved cognitive processing can exist, as evidenced by the formation of sentences during communication sessions, challenging previous assumptions about complete loss of thought capabilities.
  • * Emphasizing feedback and reinforcement as essential for effective communication, the study also highlights the significance of psychosocial factors and the length of immobilization in understanding barriers to communication in locked-in patients.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

In the literature on human action control, the binding and retrieval of responses are assumed to shape the coordination of more complex actions. Specifically, the consecutive execution of two responses is assumed to result in their integration into cognitive representations (so-called event files) and can be retrieved from that upon later response repetition, thereby influencing behavior. Against the background of ideomotor theory and more recent theorizing in the binding and retrieval in action control framework (Frings et al.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Motor imagery (MI) of one's own movements is thought to involve the sub-threshold activation of one's own motor codes. Movement coordination during joint action is thought to occur because co-actors integrate a simulation of their own actions with the simulated actions of the partner. The present experiments gained insight into MI of joint action by investigating if and how the assumed motor capabilitiesof the imaginary partner affected MI.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!