A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Advanced Multimodal Methods for Cranial Pseudo-CT Generation Validated by IMRT and VMAT Radiation Therapy Plans. | LitMetric

Advanced Multimodal Methods for Cranial Pseudo-CT Generation Validated by IMRT and VMAT Radiation Therapy Plans.

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital & Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of BioMedical Physics in Radiation Oncology, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Physics and Astronomy, Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

Published: November 2018

Purpose: To investigate advanced multimodal methods for pseudo-computed tomography (CT) generation from standard magnetic resonance imaging sequences and to validate the results by intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans. We present 2 novel methods that employ key techniques to enhance pseudo-CTs and investigate the effect on image quality and applicability for IMRT and VMAT planning.

Materials And Methods: The data set contains CT and magnetic resonance image scans from 15 patients who underwent cranial radiation therapy. For each patient, pseudo-CTs of the head were generated with a patch-based and a voxel-based algorithm. The accuracy of the pseudo-CTs in comparison to clinical CTs was evaluated by mean absolute error, bias, and the Dice coefficient (of bone). IMRT and VMAT plans were created for each patient. Dose distributions were calculated with both the pseudo-CT and the clinical CT scans and compared by gamma tests, dose-volume histograms, and isocenter doses.

Results: The generated pseudo-CTs exhibited average mean absolute errors of 118.7 ± 10.4 HU for the voxel-based algorithm and 73.0 ± 6.4 HU for the patch-based algorithm. The dose calculations were in good agreement and showed gamma test (2 mm, 2%) pass rates for both beam setups (IMRT and VMAT) of over 99% for 14 patients and over 98% for 1 patient.

Conclusions: We showed that the key techniques of our 2 novel algorithms advance the quality of pseudo-CT significantly and generate very competitive pseudo-CTs compared with previously published methods. This quality was confirmed by low dose error in comparison to the ground-truth CT. With the achieved level of accuracy, our patch-based algorithm especially is a candidate for clinical routine use in IMRT and VMAT planning.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.06.024DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

imrt vmat
20
radiation therapy
12
advanced multimodal
8
multimodal methods
8
magnetic resonance
8
vmat plans
8
key techniques
8
voxel-based algorithm
8
patch-based algorithm
8
imrt
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!