Sulfate-reducing prokaryotes (SRP) and sulfur-oxidizing prokaryotes (SOP) play vital roles in the sulfur cycle. The SRP community was used to represent a microbial community with high richness and diversity. The 454 pyrosequencing, Illumina high-throughput sequencing, and traditional clone library methods that target the dissimilatory sulfite reductase subunit gene (), which encodes a key enzyme in the sulfate reduction pathway, were used to compare the differences in SRP community characteristics. Comparative analyses suggested that Illumina high-throughput sequencing was a more appropriate method for SRP (high richness and diversity) community studies. The SOP gene (~750 bp) was used as a representative of the long-sequence segment. The 454 pyrosequencing and Illumina high-throughput sequencing methods were used to compare the differences in SOP community characteristics. The results revealed that 454 pyrosequencing did not reflect its advantage of a longer read length; whereas, the Illumina high-throughput sequencing with more numerous and shorter sequence reads was more suitable when the gene was used to investigate the community composition and diversity of SOP.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.201705054DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

illumina high-throughput
16
high-throughput sequencing
16
454 pyrosequencing
12
srp community
8
high richness
8
richness diversity
8
pyrosequencing illumina
8
compare differences
8
community characteristics
8
community
7

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!