[Research of Parameter Uncertainty for the HSPF Model Under Different Temporal Scales].

Huan Jing Ke Xue

Nanjing Smartwater Environmental Technology Co., Ltd., Nanjing 210012, China.

Published: May 2018

AI Article Synopsis

  • - Various hydrological models, like the HSPF model, were used to manage water resources and assess water quality, with a focus on parameter uncertainty in simulations.
  • - The HSPF model showed strong performance with a Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency of 0.84 during calibration and 0.55 during validation; the parameters were categorized into global, regional, and non-sensitive types, indicating varying levels of impact on simulation outcomes.
  • - The study found that precipitation significantly affects simulation uncertainty, and overall performance improved with annual analyses, suggesting that using an annual scale may yield the most accurate results for hydrological simulations.

Article Abstract

Various hydrological models have been applied to the management of water resources and water quality. However, parameter uncertainty is of perpetual interest in the application of hydrological models. In this context, the HSPF model was constructed and calibrated using monthly observed stream data from 1998 to 2010 in the Chaohe River watershed, northeast of Beijing. Specifically, the sensitivity and uncertainty of the model parameters were investigated by the GLUE algorithm with the PEST platform. The major results were illustrated as follows:① the hydrological simulation shows good performance with Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency of 0.84 and 0.55 in the period of calibration and validation, respectively; ② the parameters were divided into three categories:global sensitive parameters (LZSN, INFILT, IRC, and AGWRC), regional sensitive parameters (UZSN), and non-sensitive parameters (DEEPFR, BASETP, AGWEPT, INTFW, and CEPSC); ③ strong correlations were detected within the sensitive parameters, which further involved significant negative correlations (LZSN~INFILT, INFILT~UZSN, and UZSN~AGWRC) and a positive correlation (LZSN~UZSN) and (UZSN~AGWRC); ④ the equifinality for different parameters was found in the HSPF model, indicating that parameter sets determine the simulation performance rather than individual parameters; ⑤ among various external factors, precipitation was identified as the most important condition for simulation uncertainty; and ⑥ the temporal difference in simulation performance was considered using annual, seasonal, and monthly scales with simulation precisions of 81.80%, 78.70%, and 80.56%, implying that the annual scale might be the optimal simulation period with higher accuracy. This research result is useful for the application and localization of the HSPF model.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.201710070DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

hspf model
16
sensitive parameters
12
parameter uncertainty
8
hydrological models
8
parameters
8
simulation performance
8
simulation
6
model
5
[research parameter
4
uncertainty
4

Similar Publications

Land use changes profoundly affect hydrological processes and water quality at various scales, necessitating a comprehensive understanding of sustainable water resource management. This paper investigates the implications of land use alterations in the Gap-Cheon watershed, analyzing data from 2012 and 2022 and predicting changes up to 2052 using the Future Land Use Simulation (FLUS) model. The study employs the Hydrological Simulation Program-FORTRAN (HSPF) model to assess water quantity and quality dynamics.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Maximizing the impact of agricultural wastewater conservation practices (CP) to achieve total maximum daily load (TMDL) scenarios in agricultural watersheds is a challenge for the practitioners. The complex modeling requirements of sophisticated hydrologic models make their use and interpretation difficult, preventing the inclusion of local watershed stakeholders' knowledge in the development of optimal TMDL scenarios. The present study develops a seamless modeling approach to transform the complex modeling outcomes of Hydrologic Simulation Program Fortran (HSPF) into a simplified participatory framework for developing optimized management scenarios.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Using monitoring and mechanistic modeling to improve understanding of eutrophication in a shallow New England estuary.

J Environ Manage

March 2024

United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 1, Water Division, 5 Post Office Square, Suite 100, Boston, MA, 02109, USA. Electronic address:

Anthropogenic nutrient loading has resulted in eutrophication and habitat degradation within estuaries. Study of eutrophication in estuaries has often focused on larger systems, while there has been increasing interest in understanding the governing processes in smaller systems. In this study, we incorporate both monitoring data and mechanistic modeling to improve our understanding of eutrophication in a small, shallow New England estuary.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • This study developed an integrated framework combining isotopic data of nitrates and hydrological modeling to assess nitrate flux from various land uses in a watershed, important for managing nitrate pollution in rivers.
  • Different nitrate sources like sewage and synthetic fertilizers were identified by analyzing isotopic compositions, showing significant variations across different land-use types.
  • The research highlights the need for targeted nitrogen management policies, particularly in urban areas where sewage transport increases nitrate loads; it also emphasizes how hydrological conditions can influence total nitrate concentrations in river systems.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Effects of digital elevation model data source on HSPF-based watershed-scale flow and water quality simulations.

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int

March 2023

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803, USA.

Digital elevation models (DEMs) from different sources have been widely utilized in watershed modeling and environment management. Yet, little is known about how DEMs from different data sources affect modeling results and management decisions. This paper presents new insights into how the DEMs from three different sources affect model-simulated flow, nitrate (NO), phosphorus (P), and sediment by using the BASINS/HSPF watershed modeling system.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!