To elucidate succession pattern of phytoplankton in the Daning River and its driving factors, multivariate statistical analysis was conducted. By using the monitoring data in different seasons of Daning river during April 2012 to January 2013, this paper analyzed the succession pattern of phytoplankton in the Daning River and its driving factors in typical tributaries of river-style reservoirs. According to the characteristics of water level, the operational period of the TGR was classified into following four stages:stage Ⅰ (pre-November-April), stage Ⅱ (May-July), stage Ⅲ (July-September) and stage Ⅳ (September-November). ① The results indicated that the values of Chlorophyll-a concentrations and algal density showed similar seasonal variations, with the highest values occurring in stage Ⅲ, followed by stages Ⅳ, Ⅱ and Ⅰ. Succession of C-R-S growth strategies was the same generally:CR-R type dominated in stage Ⅰ, CS, CR/CS and R-CR dominated in stage Ⅱ, Ⅲ and Ⅳ, respectively. ② The mean values of Margalef index and Pielou index in stage Ⅳ and Ⅲ were significantly greater than those in stage Ⅱ and Ⅰ; the value of Shannon-waver index showed that the highest value in stage Ⅲ, followed in a descending order by stage Ⅰ,Ⅱ and Ⅳ; the successional rate had the highest value in stage Ⅳ, followed in descending order by stage Ⅲ, Ⅰ and Ⅱ. ③ The results of Correlation analysis suggested that no significant relationships were observed between the environmental parameters and phytoplankton abundance in stage Ⅰ. The results indicated that relative water column stability(RWCS), index of feasible energy for phytoplankton () and index of feasible energy (Ef) were key regulatory factors for phytoplankton community in stage Ⅰ. The results indicated that , Ef and total phosphorus (TP) were key regulatory factors for phytoplankton abundance in stage Ⅱ. The results of the redundancy analysis (RDA) suggested that RWCS, TP and the ratio of euphotic depth[()] to mixing depth ()[()/] were key regulatory factors for phytoplankton community composition in stage Ⅱ. The results indicated that Ef and TP were key regulatory factors for phytoplankton abundance in stage Ⅲ. The results of the RDA suggested that[()/],, Ef and TP were key regulatory factors for phytoplankton community composition in stage Ⅲ. The results indicated that TP was key regulatory factor for phytoplankton abundance in stage Ⅳ. The results of the RDA suggested that[()/] was key regulatory factor for phytoplankton community composition in stage Ⅳ.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.201606137 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!