Objective: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have shown tocilizumab (TCZ) administered intravenously or subcutaneously with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) to be superior to csDMARDs alone for improving rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease activity. This study evaluated the effect of TCZ-intravenous and TCZ-subcutaneous on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in three RCT populations.

Methods: OPTION (NCT00106548), BREVACTA (NCT01232569) and SUMMACTA (NCT01194414) were independent RCTs evaluating the efficacy and safety of TCZ-intravenous and/or TCZ-subcutaneous with csDMARDs in patients with RA. PROs included patient global assessment, pain, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue and Short Form-36. Study outcomes included the proportions of patients reporting changes from baseline in PRO scores ≥ minimum clinically important differences (MCID) and scores ≥ age and gender-matched normative values.

Results: In OPTION, more patients who received TCZ-intravenous reported improvements in PROs ≥MCID (50%-82% vs 31%-57%) and scores ≥ normative values (16%-44% vs 5%-28%) at week 16 compared with placebo. Similarly, a greater proportion of patients in BREVACTA who received TCZ-subcutaneous reported improvements ≥ MCID (54%-73% vs 42%-55%) and scores ≥ normative values (8%-34% vs 4%-25%) at week 12 compared with placebo. In SUMMACTA, 61%-84% of patients who received TCZ-subcutaneous and 64%-84% of those who received TCZ-intravenous reported improvements ≥ MCID and 14%-41% and 15%-24%, respectively, scores ≥ normative values at week 24.

Conclusions: TCZ-intravenous or TCZ-subcutaneous with csDMARDs resulted in more patients reporting clinically meaningful improvements and PRO scores ≥ normative values compared with placebo. These improvements were similar with TCZ-intravenous and TCZ-subcutaneous.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6018870PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2017-000602DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

scores ≥
24
≥ normative
16
normative values
16
tcz-intravenous tcz-subcutaneous
12
reported improvements
12
compared placebo
12
administered intravenously
8
intravenously subcutaneously
8
rheumatoid arthritis
8
tcz-subcutaneous csdmards
8

Similar Publications

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a significant vascular condition characterized by the dilation of the abdominal aorta, presenting a substantial risk of rupture and associated high mortality rates. Current management strategies primarily rely on aneurysm diameter and growth rates to predict rupture risk and determine the timing of surgical intervention. However, this approach has limitations, as ruptures can occur in smaller AAAs below surgical thresholds, and many large AAAs remain stable without intervention.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) clinical pathways have demonstrated improved perioperative outcomes after major surgery. However, its adoption within vascular surgery has been limited. In this study, we examined the impact of an ERAS protocol with multimodal anesthesia on open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair by comparing early outcomes before and after its implementation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Single-center studies have suggested that solid organ transplant recipients are at increased risk for arterial aneurysms. Moreover, they describe a more aggressive natural history with increased rates of expansion and rupture. In this exploratory analysis, we aim to assess the frequency of arterial aneurysms in solid organ transplant recipients using a large-scale national database.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: The Vascular Study Group of New England (VSGNE) risk prediction model is a simple method for estimating risk for elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. The model considers both treatment methods and the physical characteristics of the aneurysm type as well as comorbidities. This research aimed to validate its effectiveness by analyzing retrospective data on Korean patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Detection of inflammation in abdominal aortic aneurysm with reduced field-of-view and low-b-value diffusion-weighted imaging.

Magn Reson Imaging

December 2024

Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No.180 Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai 200032, China; Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, No.180 Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai 200032, China. Electronic address:

Objectives: To evaluate the performance of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with an optimal b-value and field-of-view in identifying wall inflammation in abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) by comparing it to delayed enhancement T1-weighted imaging (DEI).

Methods: Twenty-five males with AAA were prospectively enrolled and underwent fat-suppressed T1-weighted dark-blood imaging (T1WI), full field-of-view (f-FOV) and reduced field-of-view (r-FOV) DWI (b values = 0, 100, 400 and 800 s/mm), and DEI. Corresponding images on f-FOV, r-FOV DWI and DEI at the same level were evaluated qualitatively and quantitatively using the paired t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!