A beginner's guide to rigor and reproducibility in fluorescence imaging experiments.

Mol Biol Cell

Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720.

Published: July 2018

Fluorescence light microscopy is an indispensable approach for the investigation of cell biological mechanisms. With the development of cutting-edge tools such as genetically encoded fluorescent proteins and superresolution methods, light microscopy is more powerful than ever at providing insight into a broad range of phenomena, from bacterial fission to cancer metastasis. However, as with all experimental approaches, care must be taken to ensure reliable and reproducible data collection, analysis, and reporting. Each step of every imaging experiment, from design to execution to communication to data management, should be critically assessed for bias, rigor, and reproducibility. This Perspective provides a basic "best practices" guide for designing and executing fluorescence imaging experiments, with the goal of introducing researchers to concepts that will help empower them to acquire images with rigor.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6080651PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E17-05-0276DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

rigor reproducibility
8
fluorescence imaging
8
imaging experiments
8
light microscopy
8
beginner's guide
4
guide rigor
4
reproducibility fluorescence
4
experiments fluorescence
4
fluorescence light
4
microscopy indispensable
4

Similar Publications

Background: Medical student-led health promotion projects are pivotal in enhancing community health and medical education. However, research focusing on the impact of such projects on medical students' knowledge translation skills is limited. This study aims to address this gap by developing and validating a survey tool to assess the knowledge translation skills and overall impact of a student-led health promotion project.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

JBJS convened a symposium to discuss the reporting of sex and gender in research studies as an imperative to improve research methods and results to benefit all patients. Barriers to improved reporting include a lack of societal and cultural acceptance of its need; a lack of education regarding appropriate terminology and appropriate statistical methods and efficient study designs; a need for increased research funding to support larger group sizes; unknown concordance of cell and animal models with humans to reflect biologic variables such as sex; and a lack of understanding of key considerations of gender, race, and other social determinants of health and how these factors intersect. Attention to developing and disseminating best-practice statistical methods and to educating investigators (at all career levels), reviewers, funders, editors, and staff in their proper implementation will aid reporting.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Translation and Cross-Cultural Adaptation: A Critical Step in Multi-National Survey Studies.

J Korean Med Sci

December 2024

Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Survey studies are valuable tools that can quickly and cost-effectively collect data from diverse populations across different cultures and locations. When conducted across multiple countries, careful translation and cross-cultural adaptation are necessary to maintain the validity and reliability of the findings. This point is particularly important for patient-facing questionnaires, especially in fields like psychology and sexual medicine.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Undetected atrial fibrillation (AF) poses a significant risk of stroke and cardiovascular mortality. However, diagnosing AF in real-time can be challenging as the arrhythmia is often not captured instantly. To address this issue, a deep-learning model was developed to diagnose AF even during periods of arrhythmia-free windows.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Quality Assurance of Depression Ratings in Psychiatric Clinical Trials.

J Clin Psychopharmacol

December 2024

From the NRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Wilmington, DE.

Background: Extensive experience with antidepressant clinical trials indicates that interrater reliability (IRR) must be maintained to achieve reliable clinical trial results. Contract research organizations have generally accepted 6 points of rating disparity between study site raters and central "master raters" as concordant, in part because of the personnel turnover and variability within many contract research organizations. We developed and tested an "insourced" model using a small, dedicated team of rater program managers (RPMs), to determine whether 3 points of disparity could successfully be demonstrated as a feasible standard for rating concordance.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!