A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Quantitative evaluation of intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging (IVIM) for differential diagnosis and grading prediction of benign and malignant breast lesions. | LitMetric

Background: That breast carcinoma is the most common malignant lesion in women. This study aimed to differentiate benign from malignant breast lesions and to predict grading of the latter by comparing the diagnostic value of different parameters in intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging (IVIM-DWI).

Materials And Methods: Retrospective analysis was performed utilizing imaging and pathological data from 112 patients with 124 breast lesions that underwent IVIM-DWI examination with 3.0 T MRI. Out of 124, 47 benign and 77 malignant lesions were confirmed by pathological diagnosis. The diagnostic performance of f, D, and D* value to distinguish benign from malignant breast lesions, was evaluated using pathological results as the gold standard. Correlation between D value and Ki-67 index was evaluated to predict grading of malignant breast lesions.

Results: The D value (0.99 ± 0.21) of patients with malignant lesions was significantly lower than that (1.34 ± 0.18) of patients harboring benign lesions (P = .00). The D* value (7.60 ± 2.10) in malignant lesion group was higher than that (6.83 ± 2.13) of the benign lesion group (P = .113). The f value (8.50 ± 2.13) in malignant lesion group was remarkably higher than that (7.68 ± 1.98) of benign lesion group (P = .035). For differential diagnosis of benign from malignant breast lesions, optimal diagnostic threshold of D value and f value were 1.21 and 7.86, respectively. The areas of D and f values under the ROC curve were 0.883 and 0.601, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of D value were 83.0%, 86.7%, and 85.5%, respectively. Accordingly, those indexes of f value were 64.9%, 57.4%, and 62.1%, respectively. Furthermore, the Ki-67 staining index of malignant lesions was robustly negatively correlated with D value (r = -0.395, P < .01).

Conclusion: Concrete parameters of IVIM-DWI can help to improve the specificity and accuracy in differential diagnosis of breast benign and malignant lesions. D value is most relevant and valuable in predicting the grading of malignant breast lesions.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6039593PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000011109DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

benign malignant
20
malignant breast
20
breast lesions
20
lesion group
16
malignant lesion
12
malignant lesions
12
malignant
11
lesions
9
intravoxel incoherent
8
incoherent motion
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!