Background: Clinical trials can offer novel and more advanced and/or novel treatments to cancer patients in advance of them being approved and available for all patients. While several studies have examined the effect of clinical trial participation on prognosis, there has been no clear conclusion from these studies. Therefore, we chose to test the influence of trial participation on pathological complete response (pCR) and mastectomy rates after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Methods: In this retrospective study, all patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy from 2001 to 2014 were selected. A total of 1038 patients with complete treatment, patient, and tumor characteristics were included. A total of 260 of those were treated in clinical trials. We examined whether study participation status in addition to commonly known predictors for pCR improves prediction of pCR. Similar analyses were conducted for the mastectomy rate outcome measure. Finally, survival analyses were also conducted as part of an exploratory analysis.
Results: Study participation was an independent predictor of pCR in addition to commonly known predictors. Adjusted odds ratio (OR) for trial participants versus non-participants was 1.53 (95% CI 1.03-2.28). Additionally, study participation improved the prediction of mastectomy risk. The adjusted OR for trial participants versus non-participants was 0.62 (95% CI 0.42-0.90). Subgroup-specific differences concerning the impact of study participation could not be shown for either pCR or mastectomy rate. Survival comparisons could not be conducted due to large differences in follow-up data in patients participating in clinical trials versus those who did not participate; however, pCR was a predictor of prognosis in both groups.
Conclusion: Patients taking part in neoadjuvant chemotherapy clinical trials have a higher pCR rate and a lower mastectomy risk than patients not participating in clinical trials for their cancer care. This finding is a supporting factor for trial participation in neoadjuvant chemotherapy trials.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-018-4829-4 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Intranasal administration of antiseizure drugs using new formulation trends: one step closer to reach clinical trials.
Expert Opin Drug Deliv
January 2025
CICS-UBI - Health Sciences Research Centre, University of Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal.
Introduction: Although there are numerous options for epilepsy treatment, its effective control continues unsatisfactory. Thus, search for alternative therapeutic options to improve the efficacy/safety binomial of drugs becomes very attractive to investigate. In this context, intranasal administration of antiseizure drugs formulated on state-of-the-art nanosystems can be a promising strategy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAdverse Events of Factor Xa Inhibitors in Pediatric Patients: A Meta-analysis and Pharmacovigilance Study.
Paediatr Drugs
January 2025
Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Background: This study aimed to provide a comprehensive review of adverse events (AEs) associated with factor Xa (FXa) inhibitors in pediatric patients.
Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the European Union Clinical Trials Register for English-language records from the establishment of the database up to October 17, 2023.
Relationship Between Laryngopharyngeal Reflux, Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease, and Dental Erosion in Adult Populations: A Systematic Review.
Dig Dis Sci
January 2025
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Objectives: As one of the most common complications of laryngopharyngeal reflux or gastroesophageal reflux disease, dental erosion presents a significant association with laryngopharyngeal reflux. This study aimed to elucidate the role of laryngopharyngeal reflux and gastroesophageal reflux disease on the severity and occurrence of dental erosion in adult populations.
Methods: A comprehensive search was performed in the databases of PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Scopus for English literature published from July 1999 to June 2024.
Unraveling Cardiovascular Risks and Benefits of COVID-19 Vaccines: A Systematic Review.
Cardiovasc Toxicol
January 2025
RAK College of Medical Sciences, RAK Medical and Health Sciences University, Ras Al Khaimah, United Arab Emirates.
The rapid development and deployment of mRNA and non-mRNA COVID-19 vaccines have played a pivotal role in mitigating the global pandemic. Despite their success in reducing severe disease outcomes, emerging concerns about cardiovascular complications have raised questions regarding their safety. This systematic review critically evaluates the evidence on the cardiovascular effects of COVID-19 vaccines, assessing both their protective and adverse impacts, while considering the challenges posed by the limited availability of randomized controlled trial (RCT) data on these rare adverse events.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe effect of different timings of protein supplementation on variable outcomes in hemodialysis patients: a randomized clinical trial.
Clin Exp Nephrol
January 2025
Internal Medicine Department, El Qabbary General Hospital, Ministry of Health, Alexandria, Egypt.
Background: Oral nutritional supplements (ONS) are commonly prescribed to provide protein and energy to hemodialysis (HD) patients. There is a debate about the appropriate timing to administer ONS. We aimed to study the effect of different timings of ONS on variable outcomes in HD patients.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!