A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic bioequivalence study of a pegfilgrastim biosimilar INTP5 in healthy subjects. | LitMetric

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic bioequivalence study of a pegfilgrastim biosimilar INTP5 in healthy subjects.

Cancer Chemother Pharmacol

Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (Biopharma), Plot No: 423/P/A, Sarkhej-Bavla Highway, Moraiya, Sanand, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, 382213, India.

Published: August 2018

Purpose: This study compared pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety and immunogenicity profiles of INTP5 (a potential pegfilgrastim biosimilar) with that of Neulasta.

Methods: In this randomised, assessor-blind, crossover study, 344 healthy subjects received single subcutaneous dose of both INTP5 and Neulasta at 3 mg/0.3 ml (n = 172) or 6 mg/0.6 ml (n = 172) dose. The primary endpoints were AUC, AUC and C of pegfilgrastim; and AUEC and E of absolute neutrophil count (ANC).

Results: All 344 subjects dosed were included in the safety and immunogenicity analyses, and 292 subjects in the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses. At 6 mg dose, test to reference ratio (90% CI) of AUC was 105.65% (99.60-112.06%), AUC was 105.72% (99.55-112.28%) and C was 103.62% (98.19-109.35%); while test to reference ratio (95% CIs) of ANC AUEC was 100.79% (97.75-103.92%) and E was 98.70% (95.52-101.98%). Both the primary endpoints met the bioequivalence criteria (CIs within 80-125%). Similarly, at 3 mg dose, these endpoints were within the acceptance range of 80-125%. CD34+ profiles were similar and 95% CIs were within acceptance range at both doses. Adverse events were reported in 54 (15.7%; 8.72% in INTP5 vs. 8.39% in Neulasta) subjects; most events were mild. The incidences of anti-drug antibodies were low and similar between INTP5 and Neulasta and no neutralising antibodies were detected.

Conclusions: Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic bioequivalence was established between INTP5 and Neulasta following 3 and 6 mg doses. Safety and immunogenicity profiles were similar between INTP5 and Neulasta.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00280-018-3620-xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

intp5 neulasta
16
pharmacokinetic pharmacodynamic
12
safety immunogenicity
12
pharmacodynamic bioequivalence
8
pegfilgrastim biosimilar
8
healthy subjects
8
immunogenicity profiles
8
profiles intp5
8
primary endpoints
8
test reference
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!