Introduction: In a 2002 survey, 2% of Flemish gynecologists preferred elective cesarean section for themselves or their partner. This study aims to determine actual preference regarding induction of labor and mode of delivery in term cephalic or breech births for gy- necologists or their partners.
Materials And Methods: An anonymous postal questionnaire was sent to all gynecologists and trainees in Flanders.
Results: Response rate was 28.2 % (241/852). In case of an uncomplicated cephalic singleton pregnancy, 39 gynecologists (16.2%) preferred cesarean section. Most (n=134, 66.5%) chose induction at 41 weeks, 26 (13%) at 40 weeks, 37 (18%) at 42 weeks, 26 (13%) at 40 weeks, three (1.5%) preferred induction before 40 weeks and two (1%) would wait until after 42 weeks. Concerning term breech, 30% (n=72) opted for vaginal delivery and 70% (n = 169) for planned cesarean section. Ninety-nine (41%) gynecologists pre- ferred to attempt external version first. Only 115 (47.7 %) gynecologists felt professionally capable to assist vaginal breech delivery them- selves; about one-third (n=96; 38%) had performed less than ten vaginal breech deliveries in their career.
Conclusions: Flemish gynecologists are still in favor of vaginal delivery for themselves in terms of cephalic position, but an increasing number favor planned cesarean section. Most Flemish gynecologists opt for cesarean section for themselves or their partners in case of term breech and state that they do not feel capable in assisting vaginal breech delivery for their patients.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
J Med Screen
September 2024
Randers Regional Hospital, University Research Clinic for Cancer Screening, Randers, Denmark.
Objectives: This study compares the follow-up rates of non-normal cervical screening samples between Denmark and Flanders (Belgium) to illuminate whether organizational differences between the health systems might affect the follow-up rates, e.g. sending of reminders in Denmark since 2012 compared to Flanders with no such system in place.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEur J Public Health
April 2024
Social Epidemiology and Health Policy, Family Medicine and Population Health (FAMPOP), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Background: Despite the recognized benefits of structured cancer screening, tests outside organized screening programs are common. Comprehensive reports on outside program screening in Europe are lacking, but the Flemish breast cancer (BC) and colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs monitor data on non-organized tests prescribed by GPs and specialists.
Methods: Using data at aggregated level, logistic regression was used to examine the relationship between health care utilization and screening coverage in 308 Flemish municipalities during 2015-18.
JMIR Form Res
October 2022
Department Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium.
Background: There has been an exponential growth in the availability of apps, resulting in increased use of pregnancy apps. However, information on resources and use of apps among pregnant women is relatively limited.
Objective: The aim of this study is to map the current information resources and the use of pregnancy apps among pregnant women in Flanders.
Facts Views Vis Obgyn
September 2021
Background: The VVOG (Flemish Society of Obstetrics and Gynaecology) published a consensus statement promoting opportunistic bilateral salpingectomy (OBS).
Objectives: The aim of the study was to obtain insight into the current opinion and general practice of Flemish gynaecologists to counsel and perform OBS.
Materials And Methods: A questionnaire was distributed to Flemish gynaecologists three months following publication.
Acta Clin Belg
February 2021
Department of Biomedical & Health Informatics, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Missouri-Kansas, KS, USA.
: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the attitudes of Flemish physicians and medical/nursing trainees regarding shared decision-making (SDM) and to determine possible differences based on sex, age, rank, occupation and specialty. : A cross-sectional study was conducted between June and September 2017 in which the Patient-Practitioner Orientation Scale (PPOS) was translated and administered. Higher scores on the six-point scale indicate a patient-centered respondent.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!