AI Article Synopsis
- The study compares the effectiveness of vaginal progesterone (VP) versus intramuscular progesterone (IMP) for luteal support in young women (ages 18-35) undergoing IVF-ET with a GnRH-antagonist protocol.
- A total of 1760 patients were analyzed, with the VP group showing a higher live birth rate (38.55%) compared to the IMP group (30.79%).
- No significant differences were found in ectopic pregnancy or abortion rates between the two groups, indicating that VP may lead to better overall clinical outcomes for this population.
Article Abstract
Background: Luteal support is a key to patients undergoing in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH)-antagonist protocol. This study aimed to compare the effect between vaginal progesterone (VP) and intramuscular progesterone (IMP) with GnRH-antagonist protocol after IVF-ET.
Methods: A total of 1760 patients (18 years ≤ age ≤35 years) undergoing IVF-ET with GnRH-antagonist protocol were studied retrospectively between September 2014 and August 2015 in Peking University Third Hospital. In the patients, 1341 patients received VP (VP group) and 419 patients received IMP (IMP group) as luteal support. We compared clinical outcomes between these two groups. The primary objective of the study was the live birth rate. Measurement data between the two groups were conducted using independent samples t-test. The variables in line with non-normal distribution were expressed as median (p25 and p75) and were compared using nonparametric Mann-Whitney U-test.
Results: Live birth rate in VP group was 38.55%, significantly higher than that in the IMP group, which was 30.79% (χ = 8.287, P = 0.004). The clinical intrauterine pregnancy rate and implantation rate in VP group were also significantly higher than those in the IMP group (clinical intrauterine pregnancy rate 47.35% vs. 41.29%, χ = 4.727, P = 0.030; implantation rate 30.99% vs. 25.26%, χ = 14.546, P < 0.001). Any statistically significant differences in ectopic pregnancy and abortion rates between two groups were not observed.
Conclusion: : Luteal support with VP had better clinical outcomes for young women undergoing IVF-ET with GnRH-antagonist protocol.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6032680 | PMC |
| http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.235106 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Optimising Luteinising Hormone Levels on Trigger Day for Improved Ovarian Response and Pregnancy Outcomes in Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Antagonist Protocols: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
BJOG
January 2025
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Major Obstetric Diseases, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area Higher Education Joint Laboratory of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Objective: To determine the optimal luteinising hormone (LH) level on the trigger day and its impact on pregnancy outcomes in gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocols using a data-driven approach.
Design: Retrospective cohort study.
Setting: Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University.
LH level on trigger day, number of follicles ≥16 mm but <18 mm, and number of retrieved oocytes are independent risk factors for polyspermy in gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)
January 2025
Department of Reproductive Health and Infertility, Zigong Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Zigong, Sichuan, China.
Introduction: The polyspermy rate is a quality control indicator in the embryology laboratory, and factors affecting polyspermy are of great interest. The gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol is currently the mainstream protocol in most reproductive centers. This study explored the factors influencing polyspermy in fertilization (IVF) using the GnRH antagonist protocol and considered corresponding improvement measures.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe impact of the trigger day progesterone, luteinizing hormone and their interaction on live birth rates in GnRH antagonist cycles.
J Obstet Gynaecol Res
January 2025
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Health Sciences University, Tepecik Education and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.
Aim: This study aims to assess the impacts of various trigger day progesterone (P) and luteinizing hormone (LH) levels on live birth rates (LBRs) in fresh in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles, considering their elevation from stimulation and premature luteinization.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study included the first ovarian stimulation cycles with GnRH antagonist protocol of 1253 patients who underwent intracytoplasmic sperm injection and fresh embryo transfer at a tertiary clinic's IVF center between 2010 and 2016. Participants were divided into four groups based on trigger day serum P and LH levels, using the 90th percentile thresholds for P (1.
Effects of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-ant) cessation on trigger day in a GnRH-ant protocol: a meta-analysis.
J Obstet Gynaecol
December 2025
Department of Gynecology, Zunhua People's Hospital, Zunhua, Hebei, China.
Background: The gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-ant) protocol is associated with few oocytes retrieved, few mature oocytes and poor endometrial receptivity. Omission of GnRH-ants on trigger day seems unlikely to induce preovulation and may improve outcomes in the GnRH-ant protocol. This study aimed to systematically evaluate the effects of GnRH-ant cessation on trigger day on in vitro fertilisation outcomes following the GnRH-ant protocol.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFlexible progestin-primed ovarian stimulation versus a GnRH antagonist protocol in predicted suboptimal responders undergoing freeze-all cycles: a randomized non-inferiority trial.
Hum Reprod
December 2024
Assisted Reproduction Center, Northwest Women's and Children's Hospital, Xi'an, China.
Study Question: Are live birth rates (LBRs) per woman following flexible progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (fPPOS) treatment non-inferior to LBRs per woman following the conventional GnRH-antagonist protocol in expected suboptimal responders undergoing freeze-all cycles in assisted reproduction treatment?
Summary Answer: In women expected to have a suboptimal response, the 12-month likelihood of live birth with the fPPOS treatment did not achieve the non-inferiority criteria when compared to the standard GnRH antagonist protocol for IVF/ICSI treatment with a freeze-all strategy.
What Is Known Already: The standard PPOS protocol is effective for ovarian stimulation, where medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) is conventionally administered in the early follicular phase for ovulatory suppression. Recent retrospective cohort studies on donor cycles have shown the potential to prevent premature ovulation and maintain oocyte yields by delaying the administration of MPA until the midcycle (referred to as fPPOS), similar to GnRH antagonist injections.
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!