Defining normal apical vaginal support: a relook at the POSST study.

Int Urogynecol J

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of South Carolina, 96 Jonathon Lucas Street Suite 634 CSB, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.

Published: January 2019

Introduction And Hypothesis: The purpose of this study is to reanalyze data from the original 2005 Pelvic Organ Support Study (POSST) data set to define normal values for apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) points C and D and total vaginal length (TVL) in an asymptomatic population of women.

Methods: In this retrospective observational data-set review, patient were >18 years presenting for annual gynecologic exams to six centers in the United States. Data included demographics, questions about prolapse symptoms, and POP-Q points. Means and standard deviations were determined for each POP-Q point in the total population.

Results: The data set comprised 1011 women; 59 were excluded because they met criteria for having POP or were missing data. This left 948 for study. Mean age of our study population was 42 ± 14 years, and 45.6% were white, 25.1% black, and 25.2% Hispanic. One hundred fifty-six had a prior hysterectomy. Mean values with standard deviations (SD) for POP-Q values are as following: point C (vaginal cuff) -7.3 ± 1.5 cm, point C (cervix) -5.9 ± 1.5, point D -8.7 cm ± 1.5 cm, TVL (no hysterectomy) 9.8 cm ± 1.3 cm, and TVL (hysterectomy) 8.9 cm ± 1.5 cm.

Conclusions: This data suggests normal values for POP-Q apical points in a population of patient with annual gynecological exams.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3681-8DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pelvic organ
8
data set
8
normal values
8
pop-q points
8
standard deviations
8
tvl hysterectomy
8
data
6
study
5
pop-q
5
defining normal
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!