A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Characterizing within-subject variability in quantified measures of balance control: A cohort study. | LitMetric

Characterizing within-subject variability in quantified measures of balance control: A cohort study.

Gait Posture

School of Health & Rehabilitation Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.

Published: July 2018

Background: To longitudinally assess individuals using quantified measures, we must characterize within-subject variability (WSV) of the measures.

Research Question: What is the natural within-subject variability (WSV) that can be expected in postural control over 3+ days?

Methods: Thirteen individuals without orthopedic or neurologic impairment (mean(SD) = 55 (9) years; 76 (18) kg; 11 females/2 males) were recruited from a community workplace and consented to participate. Participants stood quietly with eyes closed (QEC) on a force platform (5 x 1 min x 6 days) in two stances: comfortable and narrow. We recorded center of pressure (COP) and calculated COP-based balance parameters. To analyze variance components, we applied a linear mixed model for repeated measures, calculating within-subject standard deviation (SDws) from the pooled variance not attributable to between-subject variability. To estimate WSV, we scaled SDws by a confidence interval (CI) factor (e.g. WSV at the 95%CI = WSV = SDws * 1.96) and report WSV for a range of conditions previously reported in the literature and the following measures previously found sensitive to or predictive of health: (primary) WSV of root-mean square amplitude of medial-lateral COP during QEC (RMSml); (secondary) WSV of COP ellipse area (COPa); (secondary) WSV of mean medial-lateral COP velocity (COPvml) during QEC.

Results: WSV was estimated at RMSml = 0.8 mm, COPa = 99mm, and COPvml = 1.1 mm/s among healthy, middle-aged participants standing comfortably for one recommended data duration (4 × 30 s trials). A look up table provides values for alternate protocols that have been suggested in the literature and might prove relevant for clinical translation.

Significance: This work advances longitudinal assessment of individuals using quantified measures of postural control. Results enable practitioners/researchers to assess an individual's progress, maintenance, or decline relative to WSV at a defined CI level.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.05.031DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

within-subject variability
12
quantified measures
12
wsv
10
individuals quantified
8
variability wsv
8
postural control
8
medial-lateral cop
8
secondary wsv
8
measures
5
characterizing within-subject
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!