Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Behavioral studies investigating facial expression recognition during development have applied various methods to establish by which age emotional expressions can be recognized. Most commonly, these methods employ static images of expressions at their highest intensity (apex) or morphed expressions of different intensities, but they have not previously been compared. Our aim was to (a) quantify the intensity and signal use for recognition of six emotional expressions from early childhood to adulthood and (b) compare both measures and assess their functional relationship to better understand the use of different measures across development. Using a psychophysical approach, we isolated the quantity of signal necessary to recognize an emotional expression at full intensity and the quantity of expression intensity (using neutral expression image morphs of varying intensities) necessary for each observer to recognize the six basic emotions while maintaining performance at 75%. Both measures revealed that fear and happiness were the most difficult and easiest expressions to recognize across age groups, respectively, a pattern already stable during early childhood. The quantity of signal and intensity needed to recognize sad, angry, disgust, and surprise expressions decreased with age. Using a Bayesian update procedure, we then reconstructed the response profiles for both measures. This analysis revealed that intensity and signal processing are similar only during adulthood and, therefore, cannot be straightforwardly compared during development. Altogether, our findings offer novel methodological and theoretical insights and tools for the investigation of the developing affective system.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2018.05.005 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!