Pathophysiological consequences of isoform-specific IP receptor mutations.

Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res

KU Leuven, Laboratory for Molecular and Cellular Signaling, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Leuven Kanker Instituut, Campus Gasthuisberg O/N-1 B-802, Herestraat 49, BE-3000 Leuven, Belgium. Electronic address:

Published: November 2018

AI Article Synopsis

  • Ca signaling controls various cellular functions and is tightly regulated, primarily through the inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP) receptor (IPR), which releases Ca from the endoplasmic reticulum in response to IP.
  • Multiple factors like Ca, ATP, kinases, and different proteins govern the IPR's function, while three major isoforms (IPR1, IPR2, IPR3) exhibit unique roles and expression patterns in different cell types.
  • Dysfunction of these IPR isoforms can lead to specific health issues, with notable mutations identified in patients that are linked to various diseases, necessitating an integrated understanding of these mutations and their effects on cellular signaling.

Article Abstract

Ca signaling governs a diverse range of cellular processes and, as such, is subject to tight regulation. A main component of the complex intracellular Ca-signaling network is the inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP) receptor (IPR), a tetrameric channel that mediates Ca release from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) in response to IP. IPR function is controlled by a myriad of factors, such as Ca, ATP, kinases and phosphatases and a plethora of accessory and regulatory proteins. Further complexity in IPR-mediated Ca signaling is the result of the existence of three main isoforms (IPR1, IPR2 and IPR3) that display distinct functional characteristics and properties. Despite their abundant and overlapping expression profiles, IPR1 is highly expressed in neurons, IPR2 in cardiomyocytes and hepatocytes and IPR3 in rapidly proliferating cells as e.g. epithelial cells. As a consequence, dysfunction and/or dysregulation of IPR isoforms will have distinct pathophysiological outcomes, ranging from neurological disorders for IPR1 to dysfunctional exocrine tissues and autoimmune diseases for IPR2 and -3. Over the past years, several IPR mutations have surfaced in the sequence analysis of patient-derived samples. Here, we aimed to provide an integrative overview of the clinically most relevant mutations for each IPR isoform and the subsequent molecular mechanisms underlying the etiology of the disease.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2018.06.004DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ipr
5
pathophysiological consequences
4
consequences isoform-specific
4
isoform-specific receptor
4
receptor mutations
4
mutations signaling
4
signaling governs
4
governs diverse
4
diverse range
4
range cellular
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!