AI Article Synopsis

  • Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a condition where the spinal canal narrows, often causing pain and mobility issues. While traditional surgery is risky for patients with significant health issues, more minimally invasive options are needed.
  • A new procedure called pedicle-lengthening osteotomy using the ALTUM system was evaluated in a case series of seven patients over 60 years old with LSS.
  • Results showed significant pain improvement and increased spinal canal space after one year, indicating that this minimally invasive technique may be effective for treating LSS in older or higher-risk patients.

Article Abstract

Background:  Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a narrowing of the spinal canal due to spinal degeneration, and its main clinical symptom is neurogenic claudication. Surgical treatment is pursued for patients who do not improve with conservative care. Patients with symptomatic LSS who also have significant medical comorbidities, although clearly in need of intervention, are unattractive candidates for traditional open lumbar decompressive procedures. Thus it is important to explore minimally invasive surgical techniques to treat select patients with LSS.

Methods:  This retrospective case series evaluated the clinical and radiographic outcomes of a new minimally invasive procedure to treat LSS: pedicle-lengthening osteotomy using the ALTUM system ((Innovative Surgical Designs, Inc., Bloomington, Indiana, United States). Peri- and postoperative demographic and radiographic data were collected from a clinical series of seven patients with moderate LSS who were > 60 years of age. Clinical outcome was evaluated using visual analog scale (VAS) scores and the spinal canal area on computed tomography scans.

Results:  Twelve months after the procedure, scoring revealed a median improvement of 3.7 on the VAS for the back and 6.3 on the VAS for the leg, compared with the preoperative baseline ( < 0.05). The postoperative central area of the lumbar canal was significantly increased, by 0.39 cm; the right and left neural foramina were enlarged by 0.29 cm and 0.47 cm, respectively ( < 0.05).

Conclusions:  In this preliminary study, the ALTUM system showed a good clinical and radiologic outcome 1 year after surgery. In an older or high-risk population, a short minimally invasive procedure may be beneficial for treating LSS.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1641148DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pedicle-lengthening osteotomy
8
spinal stenosis
8
spinal canal
8
minimally invasive
8
spinal
6
percutaneous pedicle-lengthening
4
osteotomy minimal
4
minimal invasive
4
invasive spinal
4
spinal surgery
4

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a condition where the spinal canal narrows, often causing pain and mobility issues. While traditional surgery is risky for patients with significant health issues, more minimally invasive options are needed.
  • A new procedure called pedicle-lengthening osteotomy using the ALTUM system was evaluated in a case series of seven patients over 60 years old with LSS.
  • Results showed significant pain improvement and increased spinal canal space after one year, indicating that this minimally invasive technique may be effective for treating LSS in older or higher-risk patients.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

OBJECTIVE Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a common condition that leads to significant disability, particularly in the elderly. Current therapeutic options have certain drawbacks. This study evaluates the 5-year clinical and radiographic results of a minimally invasive pedicle-lengthening osteotomy (PLO) for symptomatic LSS.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A comparison of the biomechanical stability of pedicle-lengthening screws and traditional pedicle screws: an in vitro instant and fatigue-resistant pull-out test.

Bone Joint J

April 2018

Department of Anatomy, Southern Medical University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Medical Biomechanics, Shenzhen Digital Orthopedic Engineering Laboratory, Satai Road, Guangzhou, P.R.C, China, Guangzhou, China.

Aims: The aim of this study was to compare the peak pull-out force (PPF) of pedicle-lengthening screws (PLS) and traditional pedicle screws (TPS) using instant and cyclic fatigue testing.

Materials And Methods: A total of 60 lumbar vertebrae were divided into six groups: PLS submitted to instant pull-out and fatigue-resistance testing (groups A1 and A2, respectively), TPS submitted to instant pull-out and fatigue-resistance testing (groups B1 and B2, respectively) and PLS augmented with 2 ml polymethylmethacrylate, submitted to instant pull-out and fatigue-resistance testing (groups C1 and C2, respectively). The PPF and normalized PPF (PPFn) for bone mineral density (BMD) were compared within and between all groups.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Pedicle-lengthening osteotomy (PLO) is a minimally invasive and effective surgical procedure for lumbar spinal stenosis syndrome. Compared with traditional surgery, PLO can effectively enlarge the spinal canal while minimizing the disruption of posterior anatomical structures of the lumbar vertebra, leading to reduced postoperative perineural scarring adhesion and good clinical outcomes using minimally invasive procedures. However, PLO is still in its early stages, and only a few relevant experimental and clinical studies have been reported.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Impact of pedicle-lengthening osteotomy on spinal canal volume and neural foramen size in three types of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Bone Joint Res

June 2016

Department of Anatomy, Southern Medical University, Key Laboratory of Medical Biomechanics, Academy of Orthopedics of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou, China

Objectives: Pedicle-lengthening osteotomy is a novel surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), which achieves substantial enlargement of the spinal canal by expansion of the bilateral pedicle osteotomy sites. Few studies have evaluated the impact of this new surgery on spinal canal volume (SCV) and neural foramen dimension (NFD) in three different types of LSS patients.

Methods: CT scans were performed on 36 LSS patients (12 central canal stenosis (CCS), 12 lateral recess stenosis (LRS), and 12 foraminal stenosis (FS)) at L4-L5, and on 12 normal (control) subjects.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!