Background: Intravesical injection with onabotulinum toxin A injection can be performed in-office under local anesthesia. Rectally administered pain medication presents a potentially feasible and previously uninvestigated adjunct to office-based anesthesia protocols.

Objective: The primary aim of this study was to determine whether adding a belladonna and opiate suppository to standard lidocaine instillation resulted in reduction of bladder injection pain during onabotulinum toxin A injection procedure.

Study Design: This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of patients undergoing onabotulinum toxin A bladder injection at a single clinic. Patients age ≥18 years, who met clinical criteria for invasive treatment of refractory urinary symptoms, had previously documented postvoid residual volumes <150 mL, and elected for in-office intravesical onabotulinum toxin A injection were eligible to participate. Participants were randomized by computer-generated block randomization to receive a belladonna and opiate (belladonna alkaloid with morphine 16.2/7.5 mg) or placebo suppository. Suppositories were placed immediately prior to lidocaine-based anesthesia, which all participants received. All participants underwent a standardized injection procedure using the same rigid cystoscope, needle type, and injection pattern (20 injections total). A 0-10 numeric rating scale was used to assess pain intensity before anesthesia and suppository, 40 minutes after administration of anesthesia and suppository, after first 10 bladder injections, and immediately after completion of 20 injections. Pain increase during procedure was calculated using the difference between score 40 minutes after administration of anesthesia and suppository and score after first 10 bladder injections. Postvoid residual were measured immediately postprocedure and 2 weeks later. Patient satisfaction with pain control was measured using a Likert scale. Our primary outcome was change in pain level from anesthetic baseline to midprocedure (score after first 10 bladder injections to score 40 minutes after administration of anesthesia and suppository). A final sample size of 26 patients was needed to have 80% power (alpha = 0.05) to detect a 50% reduction in bladder injection pain during the procedure as defined by our primary outcome. An intent-to-treat approach was used for all analyses.

Results: In all, 26 participants were enrolled and randomized with 13 in each study arm. Participants in the treatment group were slightly older than in the placebo group (P = .05); there were no statistically significant differences in medical comorbidities. Median score after first 10 bladder injections to score 40 minutes after administration of anesthesia and suppository for the placebo group and treatment group was 4 (range 1-10) and 5 (range 0,9), respectively (P = .94). Median scores immediately after completion of 20 injections for the placebo group and treatment group were 3 (range 0-10) and 2 (range 0,8), respectively (P = .29). There were no significant differences in preinjection pain scores reported before anesthesia and suppository and at 40 minutes after administration of anesthesia and suppository. Postprocedure postvoid residual >200 mL was noted in 5 (38%) of the placebo group and 3 (23%) of the treatment group (P = .67). Two-week postprocedure postvoid residual >200 mL was noted in 3 (25%) of the placebo group and 2 (15%) of the treatment group (P = .64) for an overall rate of 20%. Eleven (84%) participants in each group reported being "mostly satisfied" or "very much satisfied" with pain control.

Conclusion: Belladonna and opiate suppository use did not significantly reduce bladder injection pain, or increase risk of urinary retention immediately postprocedure or 2 weeks later. Satisfaction with pain control among onabotulinum toxin A injection patients is high.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2018.06.004DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

onabotulinum toxin
20
belladonna opiate
12
opiate suppository
12
toxin injection
12
bladder injection
12
injection pain
8
postvoid residual
8
placebo group
8
treatment group
8
group p =
8

Similar Publications

A Study of Combined Onabotulinumtoxin A and Hyaluronic Acid Filler for the Treatment of Enlarged Facial Pores.

Toxins (Basel)

January 2025

Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.

Introduction: Enlarged facial pores are a common cosmetic concern caused by excessive sebum production, visible hair shafts, and a reduction in skin elasticity, leading to a decrease in skin quality and overall appearance. Various treatment modalities have been explored to address this issue. This study focuses on the efficacy and safety of combining Onabotulinumtoxin A (OnaBoNT-A) and hyaluronic acid filler (HA filler) to target enlarged facial pores in Asians.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Importance: Patients deciding between advanced therapies for overactive bladder syndrome may be interested to know the likelihood of treatment crossover after sacral neuromodulation, intradetrusor OnabotulinumtoxinA, or percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation. Treatment crossover was defined as a switch from one advanced therapy to another.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to estimate the rate of treatment crossover after each advanced therapy for nonneurogenic overactive bladder syndrome.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Onabotulinum Toxin A-Led Urinary Tract Infections-Should we Safeguard? A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Int Urogynecol J

January 2025

Department of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Atlantic Health System, 435 South Street, Suite 370, Morristown, NJ, 07960, USA.

Introduction And Hypothesis: The objective of our study was to evaluate the need for antibiotic prophylaxis for urinary tract infection (UTI) prevention before Onabotulinum toxin A injection for overactive bladder (OAB). We hypothesize that the lack of antibiotic prophylaxis might not be inferior to administering prophylaxis.

Methods: This was a multi-centered, nonblinded, randomized controlled trial conducted between August 2022 and September 2024.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Botulinum Toxin-loaded Detachable Dissolvable Microneedles for Primary Axillary Hyperhidrosis: A Pilot Study on Efficacy and Safety.

J Clin Aesthet Dermatol

January 2025

Drs. Triwatcharikorn, Charoenchaipiyakul, Chuenboonngarm, Kantikosum, Chottawornsak, Chancheewa, Puaratanaarunkon, Panchaprateep, Kumtornrut, and Asawanonda are affiliated with the Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine at Chulalongkorn University in Bangkok, Thailand.

Objective: Botulinum toxin injection is a well-established treatment for primary hyperhidrosis. The botulinum toxin-loaded detachable dissolvable microneedles (BoNT-MNs) were developed in a result of disadvantages of the intradermal procedure. This pilot study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of BoNT-MNs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: To evaluate possible predictors of elevated postvoid residual volume (PVR) following onabotulinumtoxinA administration in patients with idiopathic overactive bladder (OAB), a condition that may include urinary urgency, frequency, and nocturia, without any identifiable cause or underlying neurological or metabolic condition.

Methods: Adults who had been treated with 100-200 U onabotulinumtoxinA for OAB and had previous failure of other OAB treatments were identified by retrospective review of medical chart data from three urology clinics in the United States treating patients with a variety of urological conditions. A total of 211 patients were allocated to cohorts based on posttreatment PVR < 200 mL (n = 173) and ≥ 200 mL (n = 38).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!