Highly publicised outbreaks of various infections related to the use of duodenoscopes have increased public awareness of the once arcane and largely ignored subject of endoscope reprocessing. Since 2015, national professional societies, multiple federal agencies, and even the US Senate have written reports and guidelines on duodenoscope reprocessing. However, their recommendations are sometimes contradictory and difficult to implement, and new research on the topic is published regularly which further complicates the situation. With this flood of new and sometimes contradictory information, clinicians can feel confused about how to assure the safety of their patients undergoing duodenosocopy. This Review summarises the most salient current research on duodenoscope-associated outbreaks and reprocessing, and aims to provide clinicians with practical information applicable to their practice.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(18)30122-5 | DOI Listing |
Span J Psychiatry Ment Health
November 2024
Centre Fòrum Research Unit, Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain; Mental Health Institute, Hospital del Mar Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Instituto Carlos III, Madrid, Spain; Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany.
Introduction: Patients with bipolar disorder (BD) are frequently exposed to traumatic events which worsen disease course, but this study is the first multicentre randomised controlled trial to test the efficacy of a trauma-focused adjunctive psychotherapy in reducing BD affective relapse rates.
Materials And Methods: This multicentre randomised controlled trial included 77 patients with BD and current trauma-related symptoms. Participants were randomised to either 20 sessions of trauma-focused Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) therapy for BD, or 20 sessions of supportive therapy (ST).
Surgery
August 2023
Department of Infection Control, Hospital Sírio Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil. Electronic address:
Background: Despite the advances in robotic surgery and its benefits for the patient and surgeon, there are difficulties and challenges in reprocessing surgical instruments, including with regard to patient safety, such as the risk of infection. The aim of this article is to evaluate the effectiveness of manual plus ultrasonic cleaning of EndoWrist devices used in robotic surgery using the adenosine triphosphate bioluminescence quantitative test.
Methods: A prospective cross-sectional study assessed the cleanliness of robotic instrumentals used in surgeries.
BMC Oral Health
May 2023
Fixed Prosthodontics Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef, Egypt.
Background: It is unclear which crown materials are optimum to disperse the generated stresses around dental implants. The objective of this study is to assess stress distribution and fracture resistance of green reprocessed Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) in comparison to un-reprocessed PEEK and zirconia single implant crown restorations.
Methods: Twenty crowns (n = 20) were obtained, five from zirconia and fifteen from pressed PEEK that were subdivided into 3 groups of five specimens each (n = 5) according to weight% of reprocessed material used.
Zentralbl Chir
April 2023
Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum München LMU, München.
In times of an unprecedented energy crisis, sustainability is becoming increasingly important. This development does not stop at medicine and especially at the operating room, where a considerable amount of greenhouse gases is produced. Due to this development, the question arises whether sterility, safety and service can be reconciled with a resource-saving use of medical devices.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!