Advantages of cumulative pregnancy outcomes in freeze-all strategy in high responders - A case-control matching analysis of a large cohort.

J Formos Med Assoc

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei 100, Taiwan; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fu Jen Catholic University Hospital, New Taipei 243, Taiwan.

Published: August 2018

Background/purpose: The freeze-all strategy in high responders is considered to be a safe and effective strategy for in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) treatment; however, the cumulative pregnancy outcomes have not been established.

Methods: A retrospective, single-center cohort study was conducted and 1311 high-responder patients (>20 oocytes retrieved and/or a serum estradiol level > 3000 pg/ml on the triggering day) were recruited from 2006 to 2015. The study group (n = 351) underwent the freeze-all strategy with subsequent thawed embryo transfer (ET), and the control group (n = 960) received fresh-cycle ET and subsequent thawed ET if needed. A case-control matching analysis was performed to match the two groups for the number of retrieved oocytes. The primary outcomes were the ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR) of the first ET cycle and the cumulative OPR.

Results: After matching, there was a significantly higher OPR in the first ET cycle (49.5% vs. 32.2%, p < 0.0001; n = 301 in each group) and the cumulative OPR (69.4% vs. 55.1%, p < 0.0001) in the study group, with significantly fewer total transferred embryos and cycles. The advantages of the freeze-all strategy for the OPR in the first ET cycle (OR: 1.97, p < 0.0001) and the cumulative OPR (OR: 1.49, p = 0.032) remained statistically significant after adjusting for other possible confounding factors in multivariate logistic regression analysis.

Conclusion: For high responders, the freeze-all strategy with thawed ET achieved a significantly higher OPR in the first ET cycle and a higher cumulative OPR than the fresh ET strategy.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2018.05.011DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

freeze-all strategy
12
cumulative pregnancy
8
pregnancy outcomes
8
strategy high
8
high responders
8
case-control matching
8
matching analysis
8
subsequent thawed
8
opr cycle
8
advantages cumulative
4

Similar Publications

Endometriosis and adenomyosis are prevalent causes of infertility, often coexisting in a significant proportion of patients. Although endometriosis typically does not negatively impact assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes, the presence of coexisting adenomyosis, mainly non-severe external forms, may slightly influence IVF/ICSI success rates. However, this impact is often minimal and may result in insignificant changes in statistical analyses.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Legal framework and IVF outcomes: a comparative analysis of fresh and frozen embryo transfers in Switzerland.

Reprod Biomed Online

October 2024

Division of Gynaecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, University Women´s Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.

Research Question: To what extent do legislative measures impact standard reproductive outcome parameters?

Design: Retrospective cohort study using data from the Swiss national IVF registry analysing the outcomes of 13,908 women undergoing embryo transfers resulting from their first lifetime oocyte retrieval before (2014-2016) or after (2020-2022) revision of the legislation, allowing extended culture for 12 zygotes. Live birth rates (LBR) and cumulative LBR (cLBR) were compared in fresh and frozen embryo transfer strategies in both periods. Adjusted multivariable mixed model analyses were performed to determine OR and incidence rate ratios (IRR).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Study Question: Are live birth rates (LBRs) per woman following flexible progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (fPPOS) treatment non-inferior to LBRs per woman following the conventional GnRH-antagonist protocol in expected suboptimal responders undergoing freeze-all cycles in assisted reproduction treatment?

Summary Answer: In women expected to have a suboptimal response, the 12-month likelihood of live birth with the fPPOS treatment did not achieve the non-inferiority criteria when compared to the standard GnRH antagonist protocol for IVF/ICSI treatment with a freeze-all strategy.

What Is Known Already: The standard PPOS protocol is effective for ovarian stimulation, where medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) is conventionally administered in the early follicular phase for ovulatory suppression. Recent retrospective cohort studies on donor cycles have shown the potential to prevent premature ovulation and maintain oocyte yields by delaying the administration of MPA until the midcycle (referred to as fPPOS), similar to GnRH antagonist injections.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Pretreatment with oral contraceptive pills in women with PCOS scheduled for IVF: a randomized clinical trial.

Hum Reprod Open

April 2024

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Reproductive Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.

Study Question: What is the effect of pretreatment with oral contraceptive pills (OCPs) on oocyte and embryo quality and pregnancy rates in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) scheduled for IVF/ICSI cycles?

Summary Answer: In women with PCOS who underwent a first or second IVF/ICSI cycle with a GnRH antagonist protocol and were randomized to start ovarian stimulation immediately, the quality of cleavage-stage embryos was non-inferior to pretreatment with OCP.

What Is Known Already: PCOS in Asian populations is characterized by high levels of circulating LH in the early follicular phase. Previous studies indicated that inappropriately high LH levels might affect oocyte maturation and fertilization rates, and impaired embryo quality, consequently resulting in higher rates of impaired pregnancy and miscarriage in women with PCOS.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Study Question: Are there differences in psychosocial and physical wellbeing among women and male partners undergoing modified natural cycle (mNC) frozen embryo transfer (FET) in immediate compared to postponed cycles after ovarian stimulation (OS) and oocyte pick-up (OPU)?

Summary Answer: Significantly more women in the immediate group reported physical symptoms than women in the postponed group whilst fewer were emotionally affected by waiting time, although the latter difference lost statistical significance after adjustment for multiple testing.

What Is Known Already: Infertility and fertility treatment are known to cause psychosocial distress in women and couples longing for a child. The treatment may be long-term and delayed for various reasons, such as the elective postponement of FET after a fresh transfer without pregnancy or an elective freeze-all cycle, possibly further increasing the level of distress.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!