Purpose: The aim of the study was to examine clinical and radiographic results of a cementless humeral surface and to evaluate prognostic parameters for implant failure.

Methods: 34 shoulders were examined preoperatively and after a mean 2.7 years. Radiographic parameters, Constant scores (CS) and complications were recorded.

Results: The mean CS improved from 27 to 51 points. Eight patients (24%) had an implant revision for secondary glenoid erosion. In the revision group was an increase of the LGHO of 8.4%.

Conclusions: The study shows a high revision-rate (24%). Predictor for an implant failure was an operative changing of the LGHO.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5990114PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2018.02.013DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cementless humeral
8
humeral head
4
head resurfacing
4
resurfacing degenerative
4
degenerative glenohumeral
4
glenohumeral osteoarthritis
4
osteoarthritis fails
4
fails high
4
high rate
4
rate purpose
4

Similar Publications

Objectives: To evaluate the clinical significance of stress shielding in patients who have undergone an uncemented reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) with a proximally coated stem for complex proximal humeral fractures (PHF) comprising 3 or 4 parts, assessed at 2 years postoperatively. Additionally, this study aims to examine the correlation between tuberosity healing and clinical outcomes.

Methods: Single Centre.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Hypothesis And Background: As the incidence of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) continues to rise, better understanding of the long-term risks and complications is necessary to determine the best choice of implant. The majority (75%) of RTSA performed in New Zealand use either SMR (Systema Multiplana Randelli, Lima-LTO, Italy) or Delta Xtend (DePuy Synthes, USA). The aim of this registry-based study was to compare implant survival, risk of revision and reasons for revision between the two most frequently used RTSA prostheses: SMR and Delta Xtend.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Greater Tuberosity Healing Rate and Clinical Results Following RSA Are Similar for Two Fracture-Specific Implant Systems.

J Clin Med

November 2024

Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel.

Various fracture-specific reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) systems exist on the market. We set out to examine whether the type of prosthesis used and the means of fixation (cemented or non-cemented) influenced the rate of tuberosity healing or the functional outcome of the operation. This retrospective cohort multicenter study included 146 patients who underwent RSA for an acute three- or four-part proximal humerus fracture and had a minimum follow-up of one year.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Over time, the use of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) treating proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) and fracture sequelae has grown significantly due to its demonstrated effectiveness over open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) and hemiarthroplasty (HA). Cemented humeral stems have been widely utilized in RTSA for PHF, however cementless alternatives have become increasingly popular. This study seeks to analyze outcomes and complications in patients undergoing RTSA for fracture with uncemented and cemented stems at mid-term follow-up.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is a common surgical procedure for elderly patients with proximal humerus fractures. Cement fixation of the humeral stem is considered the gold standard for this procedure. Due to the high prevalence of osteoporosis in this patient population, the risk of intraoperative fractures is increased when uncemented stems are used.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!