Exploring constructs of well-being, happiness and quality of life.

PeerJ

School of Social Sciences and Public Policy, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.

Published: June 2018

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigated the connections between happiness, subjective well-being, and quality of life using well-established measurement tools, with a sample of 180 university students.
  • Findings revealed that these constructs share a significant overlap, with high correlations among happiness, psychological quality of life, and life satisfaction, while social and environmental factors were less impactful.
  • The research supports the idea of a global well-being dimension, suggesting that terms like happiness and subjective well-being can be used interchangeably, although more extensive research is needed.

Article Abstract

Background: Existing definitions of happiness, subjective well-being, and quality of life suggest conceptual overlap between these constructs. This study explored the relationship between these well-being constructs by applying widely used measures with satisfactory psychometric properties.

Materials And Methods: University students ( = 180) completed widely used well-being measures including the Oxford Happiness Questionnaire (OHQ), the World Health Organization Quality of Life Questionnaire, the Satisfaction with Life Scale, and the Positive and Negative Affect Scale. We analyzed the data using correlation, regression, and exploratory factor analysis.

Results: All included well-being measures demonstrated high loadings on the global well-being construct that explains about 80% of the variance in the OHQ, the psychological domain of Quality of Life and subjective well-being. The results show high positive correlations between happiness, psychological and health domains of quality of life, life satisfaction, and positive affect. Social and environmental domains of quality of life were poor predictors of happiness and subjective well-being after controlling for psychological quality of life.

Conclusion: Together, these data provide support for a global well-being dimension and interchangeable use of terms happiness, subjective well-being, and psychological quality of life with the current sample and measures. Further investigation with larger heterogeneous samples and other well-being measures is warranted.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5985772PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4903DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

quality life
28
subjective well-being
16
happiness subjective
12
well-being measures
12
well-being
11
life
9
quality
8
global well-being
8
domains quality
8
psychological quality
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!