A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Predictors of Zero X-Ray Ablation for Supraventricular Tachycardias in a Nationwide Multicenter Experience. | LitMetric

Predictors of Zero X-Ray Ablation for Supraventricular Tachycardias in a Nationwide Multicenter Experience.

Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol

From the Cardiology Department, Ospedale Alessandro Manzoni, Lecco, Italy (A.P., R.B., G.d.V.); Cardiology Department, Ospedale Treviglio e Caravaggio, Italy (G.B.); Cardiology Department, Ospedale San Bortolo, Vicenza, Italy (C.B.); Cardiology Department, Ospedale Cisanello, Azienda Ospedalieria Universitaria, Pisa, Italy (M.G.B.); Cardiology Department, Ospedale Santa Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia, Italy (N.B.); Cardiology Department, Ospedale San Gerardo, Monza, Italy (S.d.C., G.R.); Arrhythmology Unit and Electrophysiology Laboratories, Ospedale San Raffaele, Milano, Italy (P.D.B., P.V.); Cardiology Department, Ospedale San Carlo Borromeo, Milano, Italy (D.M.); Cardiology Department, Ospedale ASO S. Croce e Carle, Cuneo, Italy (E.M.); Johnson & Johnson Med, Biosense Webster Italy, Milano (V.N.); Cardiology Department, Ospedale San Paolo, Milano, Italy (M.S.N.); Cardiology Department, Ospedale Santissima Trinità, Cagliari, Italy (S.O.); Cardiology Department, Ospedale S. Antonio Abate, Gallarate, Italy (D.O.); Cardiology Department, Ospedale San Filippo Neri, Roma, Italy (C.P.); Cardiology Department, A.S.S.T Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milano, Italy (S.P.); Cardiology Department, Ospedale Guglielmo da Saliceto, Piacenza, Italy (D.P., L.R.); Cardiology Department, Ospedale San Carlo Poma, Mantova, Italy (P.P.); Cardiology Department, Azienda Ospedaliera SS. Antonio e Biagio, Alessandria, Italy (A.S.); Cardiology Department, Ospedale Multimedica, Sesto San Giovanni, Italy (A.V.); Cardiology Department, Ospedale San Francesco, Nuoro, Italy (G.V.); Cardiology Department, Ospedale Santa Maria alle Scotte, Siena, Italy (V.Z.); and Cardiology Department, Ospedale Civile, Mirano, Italy (F.Z.).

Published: March 2018

AI Article Synopsis

  • This multicenter study investigated factors influencing zero-fluoroscopy (ZFL) ablation procedures for supraventricular tachycardias among 430 patients.
  • Results showed ZFL was achieved in 67.2% of procedures, with key predictors including the operator’s experience, type of arrhythmia, and the patient's age.
  • The use of 3D mapping systems was effective in all cases, minimizing fluoroscopy use while maintaining high safety and effectiveness.

Article Abstract

Background: This multicenter, prospective study evaluated the determinants of zero-fluoroscopy (ZFL) ablation of supraventricular tachycardias.

Methods And Results: Four hundred thirty patients (215 male, 55.4±22.1 years) with indication to electrophysiological study or ablation of supraventricular tachycardias were enrolled. All participating physicians agreed to follow the as low as reasonably achievable policy. A procedure was defined as ZFL when no fluoroscopy was used. The total fluoroscopy time inversely correlated to the number of procedures previously performed by each operator since study start (=-0.112; =0.02). Two hundred eighty-nine procedures (67.2%) were ZFL; multivariable analysis identified as predictors of ZFL: procedure after the 30th for each operator, compared with procedures up to the ninth (=0.011; hazard ratio, 3.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.79-6.80); the type of arrhythmia (=0.031; electrophysiological study and atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia ablation having the highest probability of ZFL; hazard ratio, 6.87; 95% CI, 2.08-22.7 and hazard ratio, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.04-3.91, respectively); the operator's (=0.002) and patient's age (=0.009). Among operators, achievement of ZFL varied from 0% to 100%; 8 (22.8%) operators achieved ZFL in <25% of their procedures; 17 (48.6%) operators achieved ZFL in >75% of their procedures. The probability of ZFL increased by 2.8% (hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.97-0.99) as patient's age decreased by 1 year. Acute procedural success was obtained in all cases.

Conclusions: The use of 3-dimensional mapping system completely avoided the use of fluoroscopy in most cases, with very low fluoroscopy time in the remaining and high safety and effectiveness profiles. Achievement of ZFL was predicted by the type of arrhythmia, operator's experience, and patient's age.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.117.005592DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

hazard ratio
16
ablation supraventricular
12
patient's age
12
zfl
9
supraventricular tachycardias
8
electrophysiological study
8
fluoroscopy time
8
type arrhythmia
8
probability zfl
8
achievement zfl
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!