The incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) attributed to iodinated contrast has been over-estimated and this has led clinicians to withhold potentially life-saving diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. There is mounting evidence that iodinated contrast plays only a minor role in the development of AKI in comparison with more significant risk factors such as pre-existing renal dysfunction, hemodynamic instability and exposure to nephrotoxic drugs. We will present data which challenge the dogma of avoiding iodinated contrast in patients with reduced renal function. Based on a rational and individualized risk-benefit analysis, we believe it is preferable to utilize iodinated contrast if alternate diagnostic or therapeutic options are comparatively ineffective or hazardous.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfy153DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

iodinated contrast
16
diagnostic therapeutic
8
contrast
5
con contrast-induced
4
contrast-induced nephropathy-should
4
nephropathy-should avoid
4
avoid contrast
4
contrast media
4
media patients
4
patients chronic
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!