To determine whether differences based on gender exist among pharmacy students involved in cases of admitted cheating or other academic dishonesty and to assess perceptions of academic dishonesty. Two cohorts of second-year male and female pharmacy students from four Northern California pharmacy programs were invited to complete a 45-item cross-sectional survey. Descriptive statistics and Pearson's chi-squared test were used for statistical analysis. There were 330 surveys completed with a 59% response rate. No significant gender-based differences were found regarding admitted cheating in pharmacy school and in regards to participating in various forms of academically dishonest behavior. Female students were more likely than male students to report witnessing a classmate copying another student's assignment. Male students were less likely than female students to perceive a student who distributed a stolen exam as a cheater. No gender-based differences were noted in cases of admitted cheating or with regards to taking part in various forms of academically dishonest behavior. However, female students report witnessing cheating more than male students, and male students may have a more lenient perception toward academically dishonest behavior than female students. The information gathered from this study may provide further insight to pharmacy programs and educators regarding academic dishonesty at their institution.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5972848 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.5688/ajpe6274 | DOI Listing |
Healthcare (Basel)
December 2024
Nursing Institute "Professor Radivoje Radić", Faculty of Dental Medicine and Health Osijek, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, 31000 Osijek, Croatia.
Background/objectives: Numerous studies have examined nursing students' academic dishonesty; however, there is still a gap in understanding the predictors of such behavior. This study aimed to identify personal (intrapersonal and interpersonal) and contextual factors predicting nursing students' dishonesty during clinical training.
Methods: A two-phase, prospective, predictive study was conducted at a nursing faculty in Croatia.
BMC Med Educ
October 2024
Clinical Education Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Introduction: Clinical dishonesty is one of the components of academic dishonesty that deals with the unprofessional behavior of students in hospital and clinic environments (medical students, nursing students, etc.). Psychological distress and low moral intelligence among students can be known as predisposing factors in performing dishonest clinical behaviors.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCureus
July 2024
Community Medicine, Shri. B. M. Patil Medical College, Hospital, and Research Centre, BLDE (Deemed to be University), Vijayapura, IND.
Introduction Plagiarism is appropriating another person's ideas, words, results, or processes without giving appropriate credit and usually claiming them to be one's own. Thus, plagiarism is a dishonest act of fraud or cheating. Objectives The objective of this study is to assess the perception of plagiarism among medical postgraduate (PG) students.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCurr Pharm Teach Learn
December 2024
West Virginia University School of Pharmacy, PO Box 9520, Morgantown, WV 26506, United States of America. Electronic address:
Introduction: Academic dishonesty is prevalent across pharmacy education. Understanding student perceptions and engagement in academically dishonest behaviors across skills activities is important, as skills curricula are essential components in assessing APPE readiness. The objectives of this study were to assess pharmacy student perceptions of academically dishonest behavior within a skills curriculum and to determine if correlations exist between students' perceived wrongness of a described behavior and their willingness to engage in the behavior or past engagement in that described behavior.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Nurs Stud
June 2024
School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine (Melbourne), the Australian Catholic University, 8-14 Brunswick Street, Fitzroy, VIC 3065, Australia. Electronic address:
Objective: This review seeks to deepen our understanding of the factors contributing to nursing students' academic dishonesty and the repercussions of such behaviours on their learning in both classroom and clinical settings, and on the integrity of the nursing profession.
Design And Methods: It was a scoping review in which a five-stage methodological framework informed its process. Six databases were searched for relevant original studies.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!