Objective: Our objective was to analyze systematically the preface and foreword of each edition of and to gain insight into historical changes in medicine.
Methods: The preface and foreword from 24 editions of and 11 editions of were obtained. Documents were assessed for the inclusion of predefined key words or topics, including sex-specific pronoun usage, insurance, fertility regulation, government regulation/laws, documentation burden, malpractice, race, medicine as "art" or medicine as "science," and others. Data were extracted and analyzed using Microsoft Excel.
Results: Changing pronoun usage was evident across both texts. From 1941 through 1950, physicians were referred to as male 19 times and as female once. The ratio of male-to-female pronoun usage equalized in the 1990s. Medicine increasingly was referred to as a science rather than as an art within the last 2 decades. From the 1970s onward, emerging physician concerns, including malpractice, documentation burden, regulation, and insurance, were mentioned increasingly. The first mention of governmental regulation and evidence-based medicine occurred in the 21st century. Since 1903, race was never mentioned and "change" and "improvement" were cited almost universally.
Conclusions: The increase in female pronoun usage reflects the expanding role of women in medicine. Another trend noted relates to increasing external influence on and regulation of our profession. Previously less important concerns such as documentation burden have emerged in the last 2 decades.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000812 | DOI Listing |
Introduction: Despite progress in promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) in medical education, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer/questioning, intersex, asexual, and more (LGBTQIA+) individuals remain underrepresented and often face barriers to equitable advancement. Emergency medicine (EM) residency programs are instrumental in creating inclusive environments that attract diverse applicants and support LGBTQIA+ trainees. Since the COVID-19 pandemic's shift to virtual recruitment, residency websites have become vital tools for communicating DEI initiatives.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHeliyon
October 2024
Department of English, University of Asia Pacific, 74/A, Green Road, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
The study aims at exploring the equal representation of male and female characters in the textbooks for young learners through the examination of the linguistic usages in the textbooks to show how biased discourses may demonstrate patriarchal social norms. Using a mixed-methods approach, it analyzed the () textbooks for Classes I, II, III, IV, and V of Bangladesh. Analyzing the contents of the textbooks, the current study examined the linguistic usage of the textbook writers.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFArch Dermatol Res
December 2024
College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43230, USA.
The use of non-specific language to describe board-certified dermatologists in academic settings obscures the public understanding of their qualifications. This study analyzes online patient reviews nationwide to assess gender differences in the terminology used to describe academic dermatologists. We conducted a cross-sectional study, examining reviews from 62 academic institutions across 39 states, analyzing the use of terms such as "provider," "practitioner," "clinician," "health care professional," "physician," "dermatologist," and "doctor.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEarly Interv Psychiatry
January 2025
Institute of Behavioral Science, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Northwell Health, Manhasset, New York, USA.
medRxiv
October 2024
Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Cross-linguistic studies with healthy individuals are vital, as they can reveal typologically common and different patterns while providing tailored benchmarks for patient studies. Nevertheless, cross-linguistic differences in narrative speech production, particularly among speakers of languages belonging to distinct language families, have been inadequately investigated. Using a picture description task, we analyze cross-linguistic variations in connected speech production across three linguistically diverse groups of cognitively normal participants-English, Chinese (Mandarin and Cantonese), and Italian speakers.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!