Purpose: Maxillary downgraft (MD) and mandibular setback (MS) are problematic procedures in terms of postoperative stability. While the amount of intraoperative clockwise rotation (CWR) of the proximal segment (PS) after MS combined with MD has a positive correlation with the amount of MD, mandibular relapse after MS with MD in relation to intraoperative CWR of the PS has not been reported. Moreover, the effect of mandibular relapse on maxillary stability after MS with MD remains unclear. The purpose of this study is to evaluate mandibular and maxillary stability after MS with MD in relation to intraoperative CWR of the PS and amount of MD.
Materials And Methods: The study included 57 patients who underwent bimaxillary orthognathic surgery. Patients were classified into two groups according to whether MD was performed or not performed: Group I had 2 mm or more MD; and Group II had less than 2 mm MD including vertical impaction or no vertical changes. The amount of surgical movement and postoperative relapse were cephalometrically evaluated and statistically analyzed.
Results: There was no significant difference in MS between Groups I and II, however, the vertical movement of the maxilla was different significantly (p < 0.001). In Group I, the intraoperative CWR and postoperative CCWR of the PS was greater than that of Group II (p = 0.010; p < 0.001, respectively). Consequently, the anterior relapse of the mandible was greater in Group I than in Group II despite the same amount of MS in Groups I and II. In Group I, with direct bone contact using Le Fort I inclined osteotomy, vertical relapse at point A showed no statistical correlation with anterior relapse at point B, while the vertical and horizontal dental relapse at U1 showed significant correlations with anterior relapse at point B (r = -0.403, p = 0.030; r = 0.581, p < 0.001, respectively).
Conclusion: For more stable results, Le Fort I inclined osteotomy is recommended to obtain direct bone contact when moving the maxilla inferiorly. The PS must also be fixed while maintaining vertical bone step to prevent CWR.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2018.05.022 | DOI Listing |
Oral Maxillofac Surg
June 2024
Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of maxillary repositioning surgery in teaching hospitals using conventional model surgery.
Materials And Methods: A total of 73 patients undergoing single-piece LeFort I osteotomies in the maxilla and bilateral sagittal split osteotomies in the mandible were included in the study. Preoperative and immediate postoperative cone-beam CT were compared in computer software (Dolphin3D©).
J Craniofac Surg
May 2023
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Istanbul Medipol University, School of Dentistry, Istanbul, Turkey.
The cheilion (Ch), corner of the mouth, is the soft-tissue landmark where the upper and lower lips intersect. Orthognathic surgery can modify Ch position, which can affect facial esthetics. The aims were to evaluate Ch movements resulting from Le Fort I maxillary advancement with maxillary impaction or downgrafting, and with mandibular advancement or setback, and to investigate relationships between surgical movements and Ch movements.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPlast Reconstr Surg
February 2021
From the Graduate Institute of Craniofacial and Dental Science, Chang Gung University; and the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Craniofacial Orthodontics, and Craniofacial Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital.
Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy of bimaxillary orthognathic surgery regarding different sequencing (maxilla-first or mandible-first surgery) and different thicknesses of intermediate splints.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study evaluated the accuracy of postoperative outcome in accordance with virtual planning in 57 patients requiring bimaxillary osteotomies with different operation sequence: maxilla-first (n = 31) or mandible-first (n = 26) surgery. The effect of different splint thicknesses (i.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg
August 2018
Orthognathic Surgery Center, Seoul National University Dental Hospital, Republic of Korea; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Dental Research Institute, BK21 for Craniomaxillofacial Life Science, Seoul National University, Republic of Korea. Electronic address:
Purpose: Maxillary downgraft (MD) and mandibular setback (MS) are problematic procedures in terms of postoperative stability. While the amount of intraoperative clockwise rotation (CWR) of the proximal segment (PS) after MS combined with MD has a positive correlation with the amount of MD, mandibular relapse after MS with MD in relation to intraoperative CWR of the PS has not been reported. Moreover, the effect of mandibular relapse on maxillary stability after MS with MD remains unclear.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Oral Maxillofac Surg
October 2016
Associate Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Boston University School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA.
Purpose: Idiopathic condylar resorption (ICR) presents diagnostic and therapeutic challenges to practitioners because of the rarity of the condition, progressive deformity, and simultaneous involvement of skeletal, occlusal, and articular disorders. The objective of this study was to report clinical outcomes after prosthetic replacement of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) for the management of ICR.
Patients And Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients with ICR managed by bilateral total TMJ replacement and concomitant mandibular advancement with or without maxillary surgery was performed using data gathered from medical records.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!