Background: The hospitalization of a family member in an intensive care unit can be stressful for the family. Family bedside rounds is a way for the care team to inform family members, answer questions, and involve them in care decisions. The experiences of family members with intensive care unit bedside rounds have been examined in few studies.

Objectives: To describe (1) the experiences of family members of patients in the intensive care unit who participated in family bedside rounds (ie, view of the illness, role in future management, and long-term consequences on individual and family functioning) and (2) the experiences of families who chose not to participate in family bedside rounds and their perspectives regarding its value, their illness view, and future involvement in care.

Methods: A qualitative descriptive study was done, undergirded by the Family Management Style Framework, examining families that participated and those that did not.

Results: Most families that participated (80%) found the process helpful. One overarching theme, Making a Connection: Comfort and Confidence, emerged from participating families. Two major factors influenced how that connection was made: consistency and preparing families for the future. Three types of consistency were identified: consistency in information being shared, in when rounds were being held, and in informing families of rounding delays. In terms of preparing families for the future, families appeared to feel comfortable with the situation when a connection was present. When any of the factors were missing, families described feelings of anger, frustration, and fear. Family members who did not participate described similar feelings and fear of the unknown because of not having participated.

Conclusion: What health care providers say to patients' families matters. Families may need to be included in decision-making with honest, consistent, easy-to-understand information.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.4037/ccn2018128DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bedside rounds
20
intensive care
16
care unit
16
family members
16
family
12
family bedside
12
families
11
making connection
8
experiences family
8
families participated
8

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • The project focused on reducing surgical site infections (SSIs) in pediatric patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgery to less than 1 per 100 cases.
  • A multidisciplinary team identified risk factors and created a quality improvement (QI) initiative, which included enhanced hygiene practices and wound care education.
  • The result was a significant decrease in SSIs, dropping from 2.82 to 0.55 per 100 cases, without any increase in major complications or mortality.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aim: To develop a nurse-initiated protocol for early ward-based interprofessional coordination and formulation of person-centred care plans to assist in point-of-care management of behaviour in older patients on general hospital wards.

Design: A modified e-Delphi method was employed to establish expert consensus.

Method: Multidisciplinary acute-care experts experienced in hospital care of patients with dementia and/or delirium in Australia were recruited by email from 35 professional networks.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Interprofessional Collaboration and Patient/Family Engagement on Rounds in a Comprehensive Stroke Center: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Qual Manag Health Care

December 2024

Author Affiliations: Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland (Dr Xie); Departments of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine (Dr Xie) and Neurology (Drs Bahouth, Salas, and Zink), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Nursing, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland (Drs Barany, Watson, Zink, and Hairston and Ms Shakes); Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing (Drs Tanner, Hanson, Hansen, McDonald, and Hairston), Baltimore, Maryland; and Department of Biobehavioral Nursing and Health Informatics, School of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (Dr Abu-Rish Blakeney).

Background And Objectives: Daily rounds provide an opportunity for interprofessional collaboration and patient/family engagement, which are critical to stroke care. As part of a quality improvement program, we conducted a baseline assessment to examine interprofessional collaboration and patient/family engagement during the current rounding process in a 12-bed comprehensive stroke center. Findings from the baseline assessment will be used to inform the development, implementation, and evaluation of a new rounding model.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Emergency Medicine Point of Care Ultrasound (EM-POCUS) is a diagnostic bedside tool for quick and accurate clinical decision-making. Comprehensive training in POCUS is a mandatory part of EM training in developed countries. In Nepal, we need to build an educational curriculum based on the local medical system, available resources, and educational environment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Family-centered rounds (FCR) are a multidisciplinary process in which patients and/or family members are present and actively participate in medical rounds. While research has shown that FCR may enhance collaborative information exchange and reduce family anxiety, the impact of the information exchange modality on the experience has been largely unexplored. Medical rounds are typically assumed to be carried out in person at the bedside.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!