American Society for Microbiology (ASM) Curriculum Guidelines highlight the importance of instruction about informational flow in organisms, including regulation of gene expression. However, foundational central dogma concepts and more advanced gene regulatory mechanisms are challenging for undergraduate biology students. To increase student comprehension of these principles, we designed an activity for upper-level biology students centered on construction and analysis of physical models of bacterial riboswitches. Students manipulate an inexpensive bag of supplies (beads, pipe cleaners) to model two conformations of a riboswitch in a bacterial transcript. After initial pilot testing, we implemented the activity in three upper-level classes at one research-intensive and two primarily undergraduate institutions. To assess student perceptions of learning gains, we utilized a pre/post-activity 5-point Likert-type survey instrument to characterize student perceptions of confidence in both their understanding of riboswitches and their ability to apply the central dogma to riboswitches. Median post-test ranks were significantly higher than median pre-test ranks ( < 0.0001) when compared by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test ( = 31). Next, we assessed post-activity knowledge via use of a rubric to score student responses on exam questions. More than 80% of students could correctly describe and diagram examples of riboswitches; data from initial iterations were used to enhance curriculum materials for subsequent implementations. We conclude that this riboswitch activity leads to both student-reported increases in confidence in the ASM curriculum dimension of gene regulation, including central dogma concepts, and demonstrated student ability to diagram riboswitches, predict outcomes of riboswitches, and connect riboswitches to evolutionary roles.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5976028 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v19i2.1501 | DOI Listing |
Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj
January 2025
National Centre for Cell Science, Savitribai Phule Pune University, Ganeshkhind, Pune 411007, India. Electronic address:
The diversity of molecular entities emerging from a single gene are recognized. Several studies have thus established the cellular role(s) of transcript variants and protein isoforms. A step ahead in challenging the central dogma towards expanding molecular diversity is the identification of fusion genes, chimeric transcripts and chimeric proteins that harbor sequences from more than one gene.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHealthcare (Basel)
December 2024
Faculté des Sciences, CRPN UMR 7077-Aix Marseille Université, Campus St Charles, CNRS-3, Place Victor-Hugo, F-13331 Marseille Cedex 3, France.
Background: Cranial Rhythmic Impulse (CRI) or Primary Respiratory Mechanism (PRM), movement felt on the scalp or the rest of the body, respectively, is a fundamental concept used by osteopaths in their practice for their diagnosis and treatment. However, the physiological basis of this phenomenon remains unclear. Sutherland, the founder of cranial osteopathy, proposed in 1939 that PRM was due to the movement of the cranial bones pulled by the meninges, themselves pushed by the fluctuation of cerebrospinal fluid and the motility of the central nervous system.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFGenomics
January 2025
Department of Clinical Laboratory of Sir Run-Run Shaw Hospital, and School of Public Health, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310058, China. Electronic address:
X-ray irradiation induces widespread changes in gene expression. Positioned at the bottom of the central dogma, translational regulation responds swiftly to environmental stimuli, fine-tuning protein levels. However, the global view of mRNA translation following X-ray exposure remains unclear.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFACS Nano
January 2025
Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, United States.
Numerous reports of nanomaterial-assisted delivery of DNA, RNA, and protein to plants for biotechnology applications emerged over the past decade. While the field has experienced rapid growth, best practices for developing and validating nanomaterial delivery tools for plants have not yet been established. Best practices are well-established for clinical/animal cell delivery experiments, yet plants pose a distinct challenge requiring separate considerations due to their unique tissue structures and cellular morphology.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!