Accuracy of pedicle screw placement comparing robot-assisted technology and the free-hand with fluoroscopy-guided method in spine surgery: An updated meta-analysis.

Medicine (Baltimore)

Department of Spine Surgery, Xi'an Jiaotong University-affiliated Honghui Hospital Medical College, Yan'an University, Yan'an Department of Orthopeadics, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.

Published: June 2018

AI Article Synopsis

  • - A new mini robot has been developed to enhance the precision of placing pedicle screws in spine surgery, but its effectiveness compared to traditional methods is debated.
  • - A meta-analysis of studies was conducted, involving multiple trials and research articles, ultimately focusing on 10 relevant papers that compared robotic-assisted (RA) and free-hand (FH) techniques.
  • - Results showed that the RA technique significantly outperformed the FH method in terms of accuracy, indicating that robotic assistance is a better option for pedicle screw placement.

Article Abstract

Background: A miniature spine-mounted robot has recently been introduced to further improve the accuracy of pedicle screw placement in spine surgery. However, the differences in accuracy between the robotic-assisted (RA) technique and the free-hand with fluoroscopy-guided (FH) method for pedicle screw placement are controversial. A meta-analysis was conducted to focus on this problem.

Methods: Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies involving RA and FH and published before January 2017 were searched for using the Cochrane Library, Ovid, Web of Science, PubMed, and EMBASE databases. A total of 55 papers were selected. After the full-text assessment, 45 clinical trials were excluded. The final meta-analysis included 10 articles.

Results: The accuracy of pedicle screw placement within the RA group was significantly greater than the accuracy within the FH group (odds ratio 95%, "perfect accuracy" confidence interval: 1.38-2.07, P < .01; odds ratio 95% "clinically acceptable" Confidence Interval: 1.17-2.08, P < .01).

Conclusions: There are significant differences in accuracy between RA surgery and FH surgery. It was demonstrated that the RA technique is superior to the conventional method in terms of the accuracy of pedicle screw placement.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6392558PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000010970DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pedicle screw
16
screw placement
16
accuracy pedicle
12
free-hand fluoroscopy-guided
8
fluoroscopy-guided method
8
spine surgery
8
accuracy
5
screw
4
placement
4
placement comparing
4

Similar Publications

Objective: We aimed to investigate the incidence of delayed-onset neurological deficits (DONDs), DOND-related reoperation rates following adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery, and efficacy of transverse process hooks (TPHs) at the uppermost instrumented vertebra (UIV) compared to pedicle screws (PSs).

Methods: We included 90 consecutive patients who underwent instrumented fusion from the sacrum to the distal thoracic spine for ASD, with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. Clinical and radiological outcomes were compared between 33 patients in the TPH group and 57 patients in the PS group, using the Scoliosis Research Society-22 Outcomes questionnaire (SRS-22), Medical Outcomes Study Questionnaire Short-Form 36 (SF-36), and various spinal sagittal parameters.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Computed tomography (CT) is widely used for the diagnosis and surgical treatment of spinal pathologies, particularly for pedicle screw placement. However, CT's limitations, notably radiation exposure, necessitate the development of alternative imaging techniques. Synthetic CT (sCT), which generates CT-like images from existing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, offers a promising alternative to reduce radiation exposure.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Pedicle screws are commonly used for vertebral instrumentation, and a postoperative computed tomography (CT) scan is used to evaluate their position within the pedicle. Medial pedicle screw breaching occurs in 20%-40% of cases. This study investigated the correlation between radiographically evident medial breaching and the incidence of nerve injury, shedding light on the clinical implications.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Study Design: Matched case-control study.

Purpose: To evaluate the midterm outcomes of unilateral pedicle screw fixation (UPSF) versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation (BPSF) in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) procedure, ascertain efficacy of UPSF in adequately decompressing contralateral foramen+spinal canal and reducing rate of adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) at 4-8-year follow-up (FU).

Overview Of Literature: Previous meta-analyses found no significant differences between UPSF and BPSF regarding fusion rates, clinical and radiological outcomes; however, few studies have reported higher rates of cage migration/subsidence and pseudoarthrosis in the UPSF.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The purpose of this study was to present the surgical technique of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic (UBE) decompression combined with percutaneous pedicle screws for the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures with secondary spinal stenosis. Thoracolumbar burst fracture is a common traumatic disease in spinal surgery. In the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen (AO) classification of thoracolumbar fractures, Type A fractures have the highest incidence, accounting for about 70%, with A1 and A3 types being the most common.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!