Metastatic prognosis in uveal melanoma is assessed by gene expression profiling (GEP) testing of the tumor cells, usually obtained by fine needle aspiration (FNA). GEP has demonstrated high accuracy in distinguishing class I and II tumors, both having different metastatic potential. Transcriptomic studies identified distinct mutations including somatic mutations in and , detected in more than 80%, and contribute to the upregulation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway and the development of uveal melanoma (UM). The role of these mutations in treatment selection and possible benefit from targeted therapy are somewhat unclear. However, until the discovery of novel agents, local versus systemic therapies remain options for treatment that can still be considered for disease control in certain cases. We report a series of patients with metastatic UM with distinct mutational profiles. One had significant liver metastases with proven mutation on tissue biopsy while peripheral blood molecular profiling did not show these mutations. The other three cases had no mutation. All cases received nab-paclitaxel (Abraxane) as a treatment drug, and we record their responses to treatment and their molecular-profiling results.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5904798PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/4256365DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

uveal melanoma
12
treatment
5
mutation metastatic
4
metastatic uveal
4
melanoma treatment
4
treatment outcome
4
outcome metastatic
4
metastatic prognosis
4
prognosis uveal
4
melanoma assessed
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!